| Authors: Andrea Krings, Amine Heddad, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
| UniProt accession | UniProt ID | UniProt description | NucPred score | Predict- NLS | PSORT II | TMHMM #helices | UniProt annotation for subcellular location | Uniprot GO cellular component | OMIM | PDB | sequence length |
| Q9XNV4 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_AULMI | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 381 | ||||
| Q33987 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_BALPA | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 380 | ||||
| Q7GEV4 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CANPA | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 384 | ||||
| P34866 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CARPL | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 381 | ||||
| P34867 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CARPO | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 381 | ||||
| O03520 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CASBE | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q8SGA0 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CHAAI | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 398 | ||||
| Q94TE4 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CHLAG | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q9MR49 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CICCI | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 380 | ||||
| Q9TEX8 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CLEGL | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 380 | ||||
| O79925 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_COLLE | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 380 | ||||
| O79927 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_COLST | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 7 * | 380 | ||||
| Q8SEP4 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CROSH | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q94WX5 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CTEME | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q9ZY14 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CTEPE | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q94P21 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CTETU | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q9MLI3 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_CYAFO | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q34300 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_DASBY | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 8 * | 381 | ||||
| Q34302 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_DASCR | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 381 | ||||
| O03522 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_DASMA | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 381 | ||||
| O03812 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_DELLE | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q9XNV7 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_DELSU | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 380 | ||||
| Q9TDK2 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_DELTR | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q9GAW0 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_DIPNE | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q9GAW3 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_DIPOR | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| O03523 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_DRONO | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| O03713 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_DRYNI | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| O48076 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_ERYJA | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 8 * | 371 | ||||
| O79198 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_EUDCH | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 380 | ||||
| O79199 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_EUDCY | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 380 | ||||
| O99799 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_EULMO | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| O48065 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_EUNNO | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 10 * | 370 | ||||
| O21167 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_FALSP | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 380 | ||||
| O20644 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_FRAFR | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 380 | ||||
| Q5VJ41 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_GALDE | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q9G9J6 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_GALMO | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q5VJ67 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_HAPAU | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| P34869 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_HETFR | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 381 | ||||
| Q71FH2 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_HYAHY | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q9B9Z1 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_HYPCM | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 398 | ||||
| Q956S6 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_IGUIG | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q8HL93 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_INDPA | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 378 | ||||
| P34871 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_ISUPA | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 381 | ||||
| Q9TDL0 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_LAGAC | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q9TDL1 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_LAGAL | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| Q9TDL8 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_LAGOL | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 | ||||
| P29667 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_LEPOC | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 380 | ||||
| O48090 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_LIAAL | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 10 * | 371 | ||||
| O48096 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_LIAOV | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 10 * | 371 | ||||
| Q9MI64 UniProt NPD GO | CYB_LIPVE | Cytochrome b | 0.02 | - | end | 9 * | 379 |
You are viewing entries 82951 to 83000 of 98716. You can see more proteins by changing the limits in the form at the top of this page, or click here for the next page of proteins .
If you find NucPred useful, please cite this paper:
NucPred - Predicting Nuclear Localization of Proteins. Brameier M, Krings A, Maccallum RM. Bioinformatics, 2007. PubMed id: 17332022The authors also look forward to your comments and suggestions. |
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |