 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching O14227 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.57 (see score help below)
1 MAVSLNDFISVKLKRYSRESPWERLRVPYRNKKQKKWASVHNNEAQLHSA 50
51 NKRNDNCLIQRSSTWRLGDMITLVIKDIPVTWLSNEGGKLYNLWEPLHDY 100
101 GTIEFMKINEPLNGQTSTTAIVQFAPPPKVPFWEPNGKINVKGVDLAVQI 150
151 DITAHRSHISRQVFSKNSFRSDQLVKIPLSSFKLGQVYDERIVPLFGVDC 200
201 GITVTESNLLVYFNFKKLCVLFDASFDKQIETFRLDFDFHSIIGDVGTDY 250
251 YDDHISLVFRFRFSPLIFRKSKNATESRVQTFWTASHLWRRHYDILPFNV 300
301 SPTTASPIELLNCHNAPIGRCNVLVLSFSIRDESDKDDIAFLLHNLEKFN 350
351 LKSQLDKVVFHLVPDYKHRCSLINDKEIEEEIAYLLQACLSKNLLSEIDL 400
401 PIILANLKKLSKERAKKFLRLILTSKTALINPSELDFTKSFVFYDLSSAS 450
451 SIHIKKLYVTPTTLRIVEDSLEAGNRVIRNFKDFANRFMRVQITDEYYKQ 500
501 KIRGGSDGFRNEKLYSRIQQLLTYGIKVGNQIYEFLAFGNSQLREHGAYF 550
551 FASGSDLNAKQIREWMGDFSEINSVSKYAARMGQCFSTTKEINRFCVDIS 600
601 LQDDIVRNNHCFTDGVGMASLSVIRRLSLEVKNHDMFPSAFQFRMGGYKG 650
651 VLSLAPPTKLEYHQGNLVFPRRSQDKFKSFHSTLEVIKISRFSNAHLNMQ 700
701 LITLLEGLGVEKTVFLELTRSQLSKMNESINSKQKSILMLRDNVDEYHST 750
751 LIIADFIQAGFLERDDAFTENLLNLYYEWVLRLIKEKQKVSVPKGAYLLG 800
801 VADETGTLKGHYDDAVLSVPEIFIQITDTSTSFGSYSTGKLKTRVIVGLC 850
851 IVARNPSLHPGDVRVCKAVRCDELMHLKNVIVFPTTGDRSIPAMCSGGDL 900
901 DGDEYTVIWDQRLLPKIVNYPPLLESSPKKSIDFLEGKPLIDSVKEFFVN 950
951 YIKYDSLGLISNAWKAWAHDHDNNPEGIFGNVCLELAEMHSKAVDFAKSG 1000
1001 VACKMQAKYHPKRYPDFMQKTKTRSFRSETAVGKIFRYAARFQRESGRPA 1050
1051 TYNPIMNTVYDPCMKLPRFKTEYLNVAEEVKKHYDNDLRSIMARFDISTE 1100
1101 YEVYTAFILFKDDLAKTVNEYGLREEVSFQFDLLKKKYTQEYLEKCALSN 1150
1151 QSAFDSSEYEERINSAVAATYDVTYDQRVKSVGNGTTEVLISFPYLFSSR 1200
1201 LCQLSRKAMLTANNF 1215
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.