 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching O18867 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.53 (see score help below)
1 MSSNIHANHLSLDASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSVHEPKMDALIIPVTMEV 50
51 PCDSRGQRMWWAFLASSMVTFFGGLFIILLWRTLKYLWTVCCHCGGKTKE 100
101 AQKINNGSSQADGTLKPVDEKEEAVAAEVGWMTSVKDWAGVMISAQTLTG 150
151 RVLVVLVFALSIGALVIYFIDSSNPIESCQNFYKDFTLQIDMAFNVFFLL 200
201 YFGLRFIAANDKLWFWLEVNSVVDFFTVPPVFVSVYLNRSWLGLRFLRAL 250
251 RLIQFSEILQFLNILKTSNSIKLVNLLSIFISTWLTAAGFIHLVENSGDP 300
301 WENFQNNQALTYWECVYLLMVTMSTVGYGDVYAKTTLGRLFMVFFILGGL 350
351 AMFASYVPEIIELIGNRKKYGGSYSAVSGRKHIVVCGHITLESVSNFLKD 400
401 FLHKDRDDVNVEIVFLHNISPNLELEALFKRHFTQVEFYQGSVLNPHDLA 450
451 RVKIESADACLILANKYCADPDAEDASNIMRVISIKNYHPKIRIITQMLQ 500
501 YHNKAHLLNIPSWNWKEGDDAICLAELKLGFIAQSCLAQGLSTMLANLFS 550
551 MRSFIKIEEDTWQKYYLEGVSNEMYTEYLSSAFVGLSFPTVCELCFVKLK 600
601 LLMIAIEYKSANRESRILINPGNHLKIQEGTLGFFIASDAKEVKRAFFYC 650
651 KACHDDITDPKRIKKCGCKRLEDEQPSTLSPKKKQRNGGMRNSPNSSPKL 700
701 MRHDPLLIPGNDQIDNMDSNVKKYDSTGMFHWCAPKEIEKVILTRSEAAM 750
751 TVLSGHVVVCIFGDVSSALIGLRNLVMPLRASNFHYHELKHIVFVGSIEY 800
801 LKREWETLHNFPKVSILPGTPLSRADLRAVNINLCDMCVILSANQNNIDD 850
851 TSLQDKECILASLNIKSMQFDDSIGVLQANSQGFTPPGMDRSSPDNSPVH 900
901 GMLRQPSITTGVNIPIITELVNDTNVQFLDQDDDDDPDTELYLTQPFACG 950
951 TAFAVSVLDSLMSATYFNDNILTLIRTLVTGGATPELEALIAEENALRGG 1000
1001 YSTPQTLANRDRCRVAQLALLDGPFADLGDGGCYGDLFCKALKTYNMLCF 1050
1051 GIYRLRDAHLSTPSQCTKRYVITNPPYEFELVPTDLIFCLMQFDHNAGQS 1100
1101 RASLSHSSHSSQSSSKKSSSVHSIPSTANRQNRPKSRESRDKQKYVQEER 1150
1151 L 1151
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.