 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching O18917 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.77 (see score help below)
1 MANGVIPPPGGASPLPQVRVPLEEPPLSPDTEEEDDDLGKTLAVSRFGDL 50
51 ISKPPAWDPEKPSRSFSERDFAFHRHISHHTHHPLSARLPPPHKLRRLPP 100
101 TFARHTRRKRKKEKTSAPPSEGTPPIQEEGGAGAHEGEEEEEEEEEGESE 150
151 TEAVEPPPSGSPQKAKFSIGSDEDDSPGLPGKAAFTKPLPSVGPRSDKSP 200
201 QRSVSSSSPRARAPRVAGERSRPWSPSASYDLRERLCPGSALGNPGGPEQ 250
251 QVPTDEAEAQMLGSADLDDMKSHRLEDNPGVRRHLVKEPSRVQGGRGSRG 300
301 GLTPTLRRKKKKQQPDRRPHEVFVELNELMLDRSQEPHWRETARWIKFEE 350
351 DVEEETERWGKPHVASLSFRSLLELRRTIAHGAALLDLEQTTLPGIAHLV 400
401 VETMIVSDQIRPEDRASVLRTLLLKHCHPNDDKDCGSFPRNPSSSSVNSV 450
451 LGNHHATPSHGPDGAVPTMADDLGEPAPLWPHDPDAKERPLHMPGGDGHR 500
501 GKSLKLLEKIPEDAEATVVLVGCVPFLEQPAAAFVRLSEAVLLESVLEVP 550
551 VPVRFLFVMLGPSHISTDYHELGRSIATLMSDKLFHEAAYQADDRQDLLG 600
601 AISEFLDGSIVIPPSEVEGRDLLRSVAAFQRELLRKRREREQTKVEMTTR 650
651 GGYLAPGKELALELGGSDAAPEDDPLLRTGSVFGGLIRDVKRRYPHYPSD 700
701 LRDALHSQCVAAVLFIYFAALSPAITFGGLLGEKTEGLMGVSELIVSTAV 750
751 LGVLFSLLGAQPLLVVGFSGPLLVFEGAFFKFCQAQDLEYLTGRVWVGLW 800
801 LVVFVLALVGAEGTFLVRYISPFTQEIFAFLISLIFIYETFHKLYKVFTE 850
851 HPLLPFYPREGALEGAPEARLELNGSAPPPTEGPPGPRNQPNTALLSLIL 900
901 MLGTFLIAFFLRKFRNSRFLGGKARRIIGDFGIPISILLMVLVDYSITDT 950
951 YTQKLTVPTGLSVTSPHKRTWFIPPLGSARPFPPWMMVAAAVPALLVLIL 1000
1001 IFMETQITALIVSQKARRLLKGSGFHLDLLLIGSLGGLCGLFGLPWLTAA 1050
1051 TVRSVTHVNALTVMRTAIAPGDKPQIQEVREQRVTGVLIASLVGLSIVMG 1100
1101 AVLRRIPLAVLFGIFLYMGVTSLSGIQLSQRLLLILMPAKHHPEQPYVTK 1150
1151 VKTWRMHLFTCIQLACIALLWVVKSTAASLAFPFLLLLTVPLRRCLLPRL 1200
1201 FQDRELQALDSEDAEPNFDEDGQDEYNELHMPV 1233
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.