SBC logo Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden.

NucPred

Fetching O46669 from www.uniprot.org...

The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.34 (see score help below)

   1  MEFPFGSLETTNFRRFTPESLVEIEKRIAAKQAAKKAKGKHREQKDQEEK    50
51 PRPQLDLKACNQPPKFYGELPAELVGEPLEDLDPFYSTHRTFMVLDKGRT 100
101 ISRFSATRALWLFSPFNLIRRTAIKVSVHSWFSLFITVTILVNCVGMTQT 150
151 ELPDRIEYVFTVIYTFEALIKILARGFCLNEFAYLRDPWDWLDFSVITLA 200
201 YIGEATALRGISGLRTFRVLRALKTVSVIPGLKVIVGALIHSVRKLADVT 250
251 ILTVFCLSVFALVGLQLFKGNLKNKCVKNCAALNETGNYSSYGKQEWNFC 300
301 HRDEDFYYNKPGTSDPLLCGNGSDAGHCPKGYLCLKTSDNPDFNYTSFDS 350
351 FAWAFLSLFRLMTQDSWERLYQQTLRASGKMYMVFFVLVIFLGSFYLVNL 400
401 ILAVVTMAYEEQNQATIDEIEAKEKTFQETLEMPRKEQEVLAALGIDTAS 450
451 LHSCNGSPLPSKNASERMRRMKPRVSEGSTDDNKSPQSDPYNQRRMSFLG 500
501 LTSGRRRASHGSVFHFRTPCLDTSFPDGVTDDGVFPGDRESHRGSLLLGG 550
551 GTSQQGPLLRSPLPQPPNPGSGHGEDGHSTLPTGELAPGGIEVSAFDAGQ 600
601 KKTFLSAEYLNEPFRAQRAMSVVSIMTSVLEELEESERRCPPCLTSFAQK 650
651 YLIWECCPTWVKLKTVLFGIVTDPFAELTTTLCIVVNTVFMAMEHHGMSS 700
701 AFEAMLQIGNIVFTVFFTAEMVFKIIAFDPYYYFQKRWNIFDCIIVTVSL 750
751 IELGAARKGSLSVLRTFRLLRVFKLAKSWPTLNTLIKIIGNSVGALGNLT 800
801 IILAIIVFVFALVGKQLLGENYRDNRRNISAPNEEWPRWHMHDFFHSFLI 850
851 VFRILCGEWIENMWACMEVGQKSICLILFLTVMVLGNLVVLNLFTALLLN 900
901 SFSADNLATPDEDGEVNNLQVALARIQAFGHRTKKAICNFFTRPCLLPWP 950
951 KAEPQLVVKLPLSSSKAENHIAANAAVGSPGGLSVSRGLRDDHSDFITNP 1000
1001 NIWVSVPIAEGESDLDDLEEDGEEDSQSSQQEVILQGQEQLQVETCEGHT 1050
1051 APRSPGSGMSSEDLASYVDEKWKDEAVAQAPAEGGDDSSSSGGSTVDCLD 1100
1101 PEEILRKIPELADDLEEPDDCFTEGCLRRCPCCKVDISKFPWTVGWQVRK 1150
1151 TCYRIVEHSWFESFIIFMILLSSGSLAFEDYHLDQKPTVKALLEYTDRMF 1200
1201 TFIFVLEMLLKWVAYGFKKYFTNAWCWLDFLIVNISLISLIAKILQYSDV 1250
1251 ASIKALRTLRALRPLRALSRFEGMRVVVDALVGAIPSIMNVLLVCLIFWL 1300
1301 IFSTMGVNFFAGKFGRCINKTNEYFSLVPLSIVNNISDCKYQNHTGSFFW 1350
1351 VNVKVNFDNVAMGYLALLQVATFKGWMDIMYAAVDARDVNLQPKWEDNVY 1400
1401 MYLYFVIFIIFGGFFTLNLFVGVIIDNFNQQKKKLGGQDIFMTEEQKKYY 1450
1451 NAMKKLGSKKPQKPIPRPLNKYQGFVFDIVTKQAFDIVIMVLICLNMITM 1500
1501 MVETDEQSAEKTKILNKINQFFVAVFTGECVMKMFALRHYYFTNGWNVFD 1550
1551 FIVVVLSIGSLVFSVILTSLENYFSPTLFRVIRLARIGRILRLIRAAKGI 1600
1601 RTLLFALMMSLPALFNIGLLLFLVMFIYSIFGMASFPHVSWEAGIDDMFN 1650
1651 FQTFANSMLCLFQITTSAGWDGLLSPILNTGPPYCDPNLPNSNGSRGNCG 1700
1701 SPAVGILFFTTYIIISFLIVVNMYIAVILENFNVATQESSEPLSEDDFDM 1750
1751 FYETWEKFDPEATQFITFSALSDFADTLSGPLRIPKPNQNILIQMDLPLV 1800
1801 PGDKIHCLDILFAFTKNVLGESGELDSLKANIEEKFMATNVSKASYEPIA 1850
1851 TTLRWKQEDISATVIQKAYRSYVLHRSMTISNPPAVPRAEEAVPPPDEAF 1900
1901 VEFMVNENCALPDKSETASAASFPPSYDSVTRGLSDQINMSTSSSMQNED 1950
1951 EGTSKKVTAPGP 1962

Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:

(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)

with NucPred



If you find NucPred useful, please cite this paper:
NucPred - Predicting Nuclear Localization of Proteins. Brameier M, Krings A, Maccallum RM. Bioinformatics, 2007. PubMed id: 17332022
The authors also look forward to your comments and suggestions.

What does the NucPred score mean?

You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper.

NucPred score threshold Specificity Sensitivity
see above fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage)
0.10 0.45 0.88
0.20 0.52 0.83
0.30 0.57 0.77
0.40 0.63 0.69
0.50 0.70 0.62
0.60 0.71 0.53
0.70 0.81 0.44
0.80 0.84 0.32
0.90 0.88 0.21
1.00 1.00 0.02

Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.)

Go back to the NucPred Home Page.