 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching O48901 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.65 (see score help below)
1 MTQEEEFMDEDVFINETLVSEDEESLILRDIEQRQALANRLSKWTRPPLS 50
51 AGYVAQSRSVLFQQLEIDYVIAESHGELLPNSSGPVAIIRIFGVTKEGHS 100
101 VCCNVHGFEPYFYICCPPGMGPDDISHFHQTLEGRMREANRNSNVGKFVR 150
151 RIEMVQRRSIMYYQQSNSQPFLKIVVALPTMVASCRGILDRGIQLDGLGM 200
201 KSFLTYESNVLFALRFMIDCNIVGGNWIGIPAGKYKKTAKSLSYCQLEFD 250
251 CLYSELISHAPEGEYSKMAPFRILSFDIECAGRKGHFPEPTHDPVIQIAN 300
301 LVTLQGEDQPFIRNVMTLKSCSPIVGVDVMPFETEREVLLAWRDFIREVD 350
351 PDIIIGYNICKFDLPYLIERALNLKIAEFPILGRIRNSRVRVKDTTFSSR 400
401 QYGTRESKEVAVEGRVTFDLLQVMQRDYKLSSYSLNSVSSHFLSEQKEDV 450
451 HHSIISDLQNGNAETRRRLAVYCLKDAYLPQRLLDKLMFIYNYVEMARVT 500
501 GVPISFLLSRGQSIKVLSQLLRRARQKNLVIPNAKQAGSEQGTFEGATVL 550
551 EARAGFYEKPIATLDFASLYPSIMMAYNLCYCTLVIPEDARKLNIPPESV 600
601 NRTPSGETFVKSNLQKGILPEILEELLTARKRAKADLKEAKDPLEKAVLD 650
651 GRQLALKISANSVYGFTGATIGQLPCLEISSSVTSYGRQMIEHTKKLVED 700
701 KFTTLNGYEHNAEVIYGDTDSVMVQFGVSAVEEAMNLGREAAEHISGTFT 750
751 KPIKLEFEKVYYPYLLISKKRYAGLFWTKPDNFDKMDTKGIETVRRDNCL 800
801 LVKNLVNDCLHKILIDRDIPGAVQYVKNAISDLLMNRMDLSLLVITKGLT 850
851 KTGDDYEVKAAHVELAERMRKRDAATAPNVGDRVPYVIIKAAKGAKAYER 900
901 SEDPIYVLENNIPIDPHYYLENQISKPILRIFEPILKNASKELLHGSHTR 950
951 SISISTPSNSGILRFAKKQLPALVVKLYLARVITLSVHIAKEGRLSCTVK 1000
1001 QYLKCLSWRCFLGGCGHSVRSAKVHFIRMFSAPVGIVQFSIDEKRHRKIW 1050
1051 VKQSCNWTDGTSKFCQEFDLADLFEPMDTNTIWCLPQS 1088
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.