 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching O54888 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.18 (see score help below)
1 MDVDSRWRNLPSGPSLKHLTDPSYAVPPEQQKAALQDLTRAHVDSFNYAV 50
51 LEGLSHAVQAIPPFEFAFKDERISLTIVDAAISPPAVPKGTICKELNIYP 100
101 AECRGRRSTYRGKLTADISWAVNGVPKGIIKQFLGXVPIMVKSKLCNLYN 150
151 LPPQVLIEHHEEAEEMGGYFIINGIEKVIRMLIMPRRNFPIAMIRPKWKS 200
201 RGLGYTQFGVSIHCVREEHSAVNMNLHYVENGTVMLNFIYRKELFFLPLG 250
251 FALKALVSFSDYQIFQELIKGKEEDSFFKNSVSQMLRIVMEEGCHTQKQV 300
301 LDYLGERFRVKLSLPDWYPNAEAAEFLFNQCICIHLKSNTDKFYLLCLMT 350
351 RKLFALARGECMEDNPDSLVNQEVLTPGQLFLMFLKEKMENWLLSIKIAL 400
401 DKRAQKTNVSINNENLMKIFSMGTELTRPFEYLLATGNLRSKTGLGFMQD 450
451 SGLCVVADKLNFIRYLSHFRCVHRGADFAKMRTTTVRKLLPESWGFLCPV 500
501 HTPDGAPCGLLNHLTAVCEVVTKFVYTASIPALLCGLGVTPVDAAPCRPY 550
551 SDCYPVLLDGVMVGWVDKELAPEVADTLRRFKVLRERRCSSLDGGGPDSH 600
601 DRKAKPVPRAVPLHHSLQAGEACAEPGAGQRRARWNYGAALHEHCHLRGR 650
651 GFWWSFHTPGALPSQPAEVIANFIPFSDHNQSPRNMYQCQMGKQTMGFPL 700
701 LTYQDRSDNKLYRLQTPQSPLVRPCMYDHYDMDNYPIGTNAIVAVISYTG 750
751 YDMEDAMIVNKASWERGFAHGSVYKSEFIDLSEKFKQGDDSLVFGVKPGD 800
801 PRVMQKLDNDGLPFIGAKLEFGDPYYGYLNLNTGEGFVVYYKSKENCVVD 850
851 NIKVCSNDTGSGKFKCVCVTVRVPRNPTIGDKFASRHGQKGILSRLWPAE 900
901 DMPFTESGMMPDILFNPHGFPSRMTIGMLIESMAGKSAALHGLCHDATPF 950
951 IFSEENSALEYFGEMLKAAGYNFYGTERLYSGISGMELEADIFIGVVYYQ 1000
1001 RLRHMVSDKFQVRTTGARDKVTNQPIGGRNVQGGIRFGEMERDALLAHGT 1050
1051 SFLLHDRLFNCSDRSVAHVCVKCGSLLSPLLEKPPPSWSAMRNRKYNCTV 1100
1101 CGRSDSIDTVSVPYVFRYFVAELAAMNIKVKLDVI 1135
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.