 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching O60721 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.43 (see score help below)
1 MGKLIRMGPQERWLLRTKRLHWSRLLFLLGMLIIGSTYQHLRRPRGLSSL 50
51 WAAVSSHQPIKLASRDLSSEEMMMMSSSPSKPSSEMGGKMLVPQASVGSD 100
101 EATLSMTVENIPSMPKRTAKMIPTTTKNNYSPTAAGTERRKEDTPTSSRT 150
151 LTYYTSTSSRQIVKKYTPTPRGEMKSYSPTQVREKVKYTPSPRGRRVGTY 200
201 VPSTFMTMETSHAITPRTTVKDSDITATYKILETNSLKRIMEETTPTTLK 250
251 GMFDSTPTFLTHEVEANVLTSPRSVMEKNNLFPPRRVESNSSAHPWGLVG 300
301 KSNPKTPQGTVLLHTPATSEGQVTISTMTGSSPAETKAFTAAWSLRNPSP 350
351 RTSVSAIKTAPAIVWRLAKKPSTAPSTSTTPTVRAKLTMQVHHCVVVKPT 400
401 PAMLTTPSPSLTTALLPEELSPSPSVLPPSLPDLHPKGEYPPDLFSVEER 450
451 RQGWVVLHVFGMMYVFVALAIVCDEYFVPALGVITDKLQISEDVAGATFM 500
501 AAGGSAPELFTSLIGVFISHSNVGIGTIVGSAVFNILFVIGTCSLFSREI 550
551 LNLTWWPLFRDVSFYILDLIMLILFFLDSLIAWWESLLLLLAYAFYVFTM 600
601 KWNKHIEVWVKEQLSRRPVAKVMALEDLSKPGDGAIAVDELQDNKKLKLP 650
651 SLLTRGSSSTSLHNSTIRSTIYQLMLHSLDPLREVRLAKEKEEESLNQGA 700
701 RAQPQAKAESKPEEEEPAKLPAVTVTPAPVPDIKGDQKENPGGQEDVAEA 750
751 ESTGEMPGEEGETAGEGETEEKSGGETQPEGEGETETQGKGEECEDENEA 800
801 EGKGDNEGEDEGEIHAEDGEMKGNEGETESQELSAENHGEAKNDEKGVED 850
851 GGGSDGGDSEEEEEEEEEQEEEEEEEEQEEEEEEEEEEEEKGNEEPLSLD 900
901 WPETRQKQAIYLFLLPIVFPLWLTVPDVRRQESRKFFVFTFLGSIMWIAM 950
951 FSYLMVWWAHQVGETIGISEEIMGLTILAAGTSIPDLITSVIVARKGLGD 1000
1001 MAVSSSVGSNIFDITVGLPVPWLLFSLINGLQPVPVSSNGLFCAIVLLFL 1050
1051 MLLFVISSIASCKWRMNKILGFTMFLLYFVFLIISVMLEDRIISCPVSV 1099
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.