 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching O64474 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.32 (see score help below)
1 MALQNKEEEKKKVKKLQKSYFDVLGICCTSEVPIIENILKSLDGVKEYSV 50
51 IVPSRTVIVVHDSLLISPFQIAKALNEARLEANVRVNGETSFKNKWPSPF 100
101 AVVSGLLLLLSFLKFVYSPLRWLAVAAVAAGIYPILAKAFASIKRPRIDI 150
151 NILVIITVIATLAMQDFMEAAAVVFLFTISDWLETRASYKATSVMQSLMS 200
201 LAPQKAIIAETGEEVEVDEVKVDTVVAVKAGETIPIDGIVVDGNCEVDEK 250
251 TLTGEAFPVPKQRDSTVWAGTINLNGYICVKTTSLAGDCVVAKMAKLVEE 300
301 AQSSKTKSQRLIDKCSQYYTPAIILVSACVAIVPVIMKVHNLKHWFHLAL 350
351 VVLVSGCPCGLILSTPVATFCALTKAATSGLLIKSADYLDTLSKIKIVAF 400
401 DKTGTITRGEFIVIDFKSLSRDINLRSLLYWVSSVESKSSHPMAATIVDY 450
451 AKSVSVEPRPEEVEDYQNFPGEGIYGKIDGNDIFIGNKKIASRAGCSTVP 500
501 EIEVDTKGGKTVGYVYVGERLAGFFNLSDACRSGVSQAMAELKSLGIKTA 550
551 MLTGDNQAAAMHAQEQLGNVLDVVHGDLLPEDKSRIIQEFKKEGPTAMVG 600
601 DGVNDAPALATADIGISMGISGSALATQTGNIILMSNDIRRIPQAVKLAR 650
651 RARRKVVENVCLSIILKAGILALAFAGHPLIWAAVLVDVGTCLLVIFNSM 700
701 LLLREKKKIGNKKCYRASTSKLNGRKLEGDDDYVVDLEAGLLTKSGNGQC 750
751 KSSCCGDKKNQENVVMMKPSSKTSSDHSHPGCCGDKKEEKVKPLVKDGCC 800
801 SEKTRKSEGDMVSLSSCKKSSHVKHDLKMKGGSGCCASKNEKGKEVVAKS 850
851 CCEKPKQQVESVGDCKSGHCEKKKQAEDIVVPVQIIGHALTHVEIELQTK 900
901 ETCKTSCCDSKEKVKETGLLLSSENTPYLEKGVLIKDEGNCKSGSENMGT 950
951 VKQSCHEKGCSDEKQTGEITLASEEETDDQDCSSGCCVNEGTVKQSFDEK 1000
1001 KHSVLVEKEGLDMETGFCCDAKLVCCGNTEGEVKEQCRLEIKKEEHCKSG 1050
1051 CCGEEIQTGEITLVSEEETESTNCSTGCCVDKEEVTQTCHEKPASLVVSG 1100
1101 LEVKKDEHCESSHRAVKVETCCKVKIPEACASKCRDRAKRHSGKSCCRSY 1150
1151 AKELCSHRHHHHHHHHHHHVSA 1172
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.