 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching O75970 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.46 (see score help below)
1 MLEAIDKNRALHAAERLQTKLRERGDVANEDKLSLLKSVLQSPLFSQILS 50
51 LQTSVQQLKDQVNIATSATSNIEYAHVPHLSPAVIPTLQNESFLLSPNNG 100
101 NLEALTGPGIPHINGKPACDEFDQLIKNMAQGRHVEVFELLKPPSGGLGF 150
151 SVVGLRSENRGELGIFVQEIQEGSVAHRDGRLKETDQILAINGQALDQTI 200
201 THQQAISILQKAKDTVQLVIARGSLPQLVSPIVSRSPSAASTISAHSNPV 250
251 HWQHMETIELVNDGSGLGFGIIGGKATGVIVKTILPGGVADQHGRLCSGD 300
301 HILKIGDTDLAGMSSEQVAQVLRQCGNRVKLMIARGAIEERTAPTALGIT 350
351 LSSSPTSTPELRVDASTQKGEESETFDVELTKNVQGLGITIAGYIGDKKL 400
401 EPSGIFVKSITKSSAVEHDGRIQIGDQIIAVDGTNLQGFTNQQAVEVLRH 450
451 TGQTVLLTLMRRGMKQEAELMSREDVTKDADLSPVNASIIKENYEKDEDF 500
501 LSSTRNTNILPTEEEGYPLLSAEIEEIEDAQKQEAALLTKWQRIMGINYE 550
551 IVVAHVSKFSENSGLGISLEATVGHHFIRSVLPEGPVGHSGKLFSGDELL 600
601 EVNGITLLGENHQDVVNILKELPIEVTMVCCRRTVPPTTQSELDSLDLCD 650
651 IELTEKPHVDLGEFIGSSETEDPVLAMTDAGQSTEEVQAPLAMWEAGIQH 700
701 IELEKGSKGLGFSILDYQDPIDPASTVIIIRSLVPGGIAEKDGRLLPGDR 750
751 LMFVNDVNLENSSLEEAVEALKGAPSGTVRIGVAKPLPLSPEEGYVSAKE 800
801 DSFLYPPHSCEEAGLADKPLFRADLALVGTNDADLVDESTFESPYSPEND 850
851 SIYSTQASILSLHGSSCGDGLNYGSSLPSSPPKDVIENSCDPVLDLHMSL 900
901 EELYTQNLLQRQDENTPSVDISMGPASGFTINDYTPANAIEQQYECENTI 950
951 VWTESHLPSEVISSAELPSVLPDSAGKGSEYLLEQSSLACNAECVMLQNV 1000
1001 SKESFERTINIAKGNSSLGMTVSANKDGLGMIVRSIIHGGAISRDGRIAI 1050
1051 GDCILSINEESTISVTNAQARAMLRRHSLIGPDIKITYVPAEHLEEFKIS 1100
1101 LGQQSGRVMALDIFSSYTGRDIPELPEREEGEGEESELQNTAYSNWNQPR 1150
1151 RVELWREPSKSLGISIVGGRGMGSRLSNGEVMRGIFIKHVLEDSPAGKNG 1200
1201 TLKPGDRIVEVDGMDLRDASHEQAVEAIRKAGNPVVFMVQSIINRPRKSP 1250
1251 LPSLLHNLYPKYNFSSTNPFADSLQINADKAPSQSESEPEKAPLCSVPPP 1300
1301 PPSAFAEMGSDHTQSSASKISQDVDKEDEFGYSWKNIRERYGTLTGELHM 1350
1351 IELEKGHSGLGLSLAGNKDRSRMSVFIVGIDPNGAAGKDGRLQIADELLE 1400
1401 INGQILYGRSHQNASSIIKCAPSKVKIIFIRNKDAVNQMAVCPGNAVEPL 1450
1451 PSNSENLQNKETEPTVTTSDAAVDLSSFKNVQHLELPKDQGGLGIAISEE 1500
1501 DTLSGVIIKSLTEHGVAATDGRLKVGDQILAVDDEIVVGYPIEKFISLLK 1550
1551 TAKMTVKLTIHAENPDSQAVPSAAGAASGEKKNSSQSLMVPQSGSPEPES 1600
1601 IRNTSRSSTPAIFASDPATCPIIPGCETTIEISKGRTGLGLSIVGGSDTL 1650
1651 LGAIIIHEVYEEGAACKDGRLWAGDQILEVNGIDLRKATHDEAINVLRQT 1700
1701 PQRVRLTLYRDEAPYKEEEVCDTLTIELQKKPGKGLGLSIVGKRNDTGVF 1750
1751 VSDIVKGGIADADGRLMQGDQILMVNGEDVRNATQEAVAALLKCSLGTVT 1800
1801 LEVGRIKAGPFHSERRPSQSSQVSEGSLSSFTFPLSGSSTSESLESSSKK 1850
1851 NALASEIQGLRTVEMKKGPTDSLGISIAGGVGSPLGDVPIFIAMMHPTGV 1900
1901 AAQTQKLRVGDRIVTICGTSTEGMTHTQAVNLLKNASGSIEMQVVAGGDV 1950
1951 SVVTGHQQEPASSSLSFTGLTSSSIFQDDLGPPQCKSITLERGPDGLGFS 2000
2001 IVGGYGSPHGDLPIYVKTVFAKGAASEDGRLKRGDQIIAVNGQSLEGVTH 2050
2051 EEAVAILKRTKGTVTLMVLS 2070
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.