 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching O95487 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.67 (see score help below)
1 MSAPAGSSHPAASARIPPKFGGAAVSGAAAPAGPGAGPAPHQQNGPAQNQ 50
51 MQVPSGYGLHHQNYIAPSGHYSQGPGKMTSLPLDTQCGDYYSALYTVPTQ 100
101 NVTPNTVNQQPGAQQLYSRGPPAPHIVGSTLGSFQGAASSASHLHTSASQ 150
151 PYSSFVNHYNSPAMYSASSSVASQGFPSTCGHYAMSTVSNAAYPSVSYPS 200
201 LPAGDTYGQMFTSQNAPTVRPVKDNSFSGQNTAISHPSPLPPLPSQQHHQ 250
251 QQSLSGYSTLTWSSPGLPSTQDNLIRNHTGSLAVANNNPTITVADSLSCP 300
301 VMQNVQPPKSSPVVSTVLSGSSGSSSTRTPPTANHPVEPVTSVTQPSELL 350
351 QQKGVQYGEYVNNQASSAPTPLSSTSDDEEEEEEDEEAGVDSSSTTSSAS 400
401 PMPNSYDALEGGSYPDMLSSSASSPAPDPAPEPDPASAPAPASAPAPVVP 450
451 QPSKMAKPFGYGYPTLQPGYQNATAPLISGVQPSNPVYSGFQQYPQQYPG 500
501 VNQLSSSIGGLSLQSSPQPESLRPVNLTQERNILPMTPVWAPVPNLNADL 550
551 KKLNCSPDSFRCTLTNIPQTQALLNKAKLPLGLLLHPFRDLTQLPVITSN 600
601 TIVRCRSCRTYINPFVSFIDQRRWKCNLCYRVNDVPEEFMYNPLTRSYGE 650
651 PHKRPEVQNSTVEFIASSDYMLRPPQPAVYLFVLDVSHNAVEAGYLTILC 700
701 QSLLENLDKLPGDSRTRIGFMTFDSTIHFYNLQEGLSQPQMLIVSDIDDV 750
751 FLPTPDSLLVNLYESKELIKDLLNALPNMFTNTRETHSALGPALQAAFKL 800
801 MSPTGGRVSVFQTQLPSLGAGLLQSREDPNQRSSTKVVQHLGPATDFYKK 850
851 LALDCSGQQTAVDLFLLSSQYSDLASLACMSKYSAGCIYYYPSFHYTHNP 900
901 SQAEKLQKDLKRYLTRKIGFEAVMRIRCTKGLSMHTFHGNFFVRSTDLLS 950
951 LANINPDAGFAVQLSIEESLTDTSLVCFQTALLYTSSKGERRIRVHTLCL 1000
1001 PVVSSLADVYAGVDVQAAICLLANMAVDRSVSSSLSDARDALVNAVVDSL 1050
1051 SAYGSTVSNLQHSALMAPSSLKLFPLYVLALLKQKAFRTGTSTRLDDRVY 1100
1101 AMCQIKSQPLVHLMKMIHPNLYRIDRLTDEGAVHVNDRIVPQPPLQKLSA 1150
1151 EKLTREGAFLMDCGSVFYIWVGKGCDNNFIEDVLGYTNFASIPQKMTHLP 1200
1201 ELDTLSSERARSFITWLRDSRPLSPILHIVKDESPAKAEFFQHLIEDRTE 1250
1251 AAFSYYEFLLHVQQQICK 1268
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.