| Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching P08799 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.96 (see score help below)
1 MNPIHDRTSDYHKYLKVKQGDSDLFKLTVSDKRYIWYNPDPKERDSYECG 50
51 EIVSETSDSFTFKTVDGQDRQVKKDDANQRNPIKFDGVEDMSELSYLNEP 100
101 AVFHNLRVRYNQDLIYTYSGLFLVAVNPFKRIPIYTQEMVDIFKGRRRNE 150
151 VAPHIFAISDVAYRSMLDDRQNQSLLITGESGAGKTENTKKVIQYLASVA 200
201 GRNQANGSGVLEQQILQANPILEAFGNAKTTRNNNSSRFGKFIEIQFNSA 250
251 GFISGASIQSYLLEKSRVVFQSETERNYHIFYQLLAGATAEEKKALHLAG 300
301 PESFNYLNQSGCVDIKGVSDSEEFKITRQAMDIVGFSQEEQMSIFKIIAG 350
351 ILHLGNIKFEKGAGEGAVLKDKTALNAASTVFGVNPSVLEKALMEPRILA 400
401 GRDLVAQHLNVEKSSSSRDALVKALYGRLFLWLVKKINNVLCQERKAYFI 450
451 GVLDISGFEIFKVNSFEQLCINYTNEKLQQFFNHHMFKLEQEEYLKEKIN 500
501 WTFIDFGLDSQATIDLIDGRQPPGILALLDEQSVFPNATDNTLITKLHSH 550
551 FSKKNAKYEEPRFSKTEFGVTHYAGQVMYEIQDWLEKNKDPLQQDLELCF 600
601 KDSSDNVVTKLFNDPNIASRAKKGANFITVAAQYKEQLASLMATLETTNP 650
651 HFVRCIIPNNKQLPAKLEDKVVLDQLRCNGVLEGIRITRKGFPNRIIYAD 700
701 FVKRYYLLAPNVPRDAEDSQKATDAVLKHLNIDPEQYRFGITKIFFRAGQ 750
751 LARIEEAREQRISEIIKAIQAATRGWIARKVYKQAREHTVAARIIQQNLR 800
801 AYIDFKSWPWWKLFSKARPLLKRRNFEKEIKEKEREILELKSNLTDSTTQ 850
851 KDKLEKSLKDTESNVLDLQRQLKAEKETLKAMYDSKDALEAQKRELEIRV 900
901 EDMESELDEKKLALENLQNQKRSVEEKVRDLEEELQEEQKLRNTLEKLKK 950
951 KYEEELEEMKRVNDGQSDTISRLEKIKDELQKEVEELTESFSEESKDKGV 1000
1001 LEKTRVRLQSELDDLTVRLDSETKDKSELLRQKKKLEEELKQVQEALAAE 1050
1051 TAAKLAQEAANKKLQGEYTELNEKFNSEVTARSNVEKSKKTLESQLVAVN 1100
1101 NELDEEKKNRDALEKKKKALDAMLEEMKDQLESTGGEKKSLYDLKVKQES 1150
1151 DMEALRNQISELQSTIAKLEKIKSTLEGEVARLQGELEAEQLAKSNVEKQ 1200
1201 KKKVELDLEDKSAQLAEETAAKQALDKLKKKLEQELSEVQTQLSEANNKN 1250
1251 VNSDSTNKHLETSFNNLKLELEAEQKAKQALEKKRLGLESELKHVNEQLE 1300
1301 EEKKQKESNEKRKVDLEKEVSELKDQIEEEVASKKAVTEAKNKKESELDE 1350
1351 IKRQYADVVSSRDKSVEQLKTLQAKNEELRNTAEEAEGQLDRAERSKKKA 1400
1401 EFDLEEAVKNLEEETAKKVKAEKAMKKAETDYRSTKSELDDAKNVSSEQY 1450
1451 VQIKRLNEELSELRSVLEEADERCNSAIKAKKTAESALESLKDEIDAANN 1500
1501 AKAKAERKSKELEVRVAELEESLEDKSGTVNVEFIRKKDAEIDDLRARLD 1550
1551 RETESRIKSDEDKKNTRKQFADLEAKVEEAQREVVTIDRLKKKLESDIID 1600
1601 LSTQLDTETKSRIKIEKSKKKLEQTLAERRAAEEGSSKAADEEIRKQVWQ 1650
1651 EVDELRAQLDSERAALNASEKKIKSLVAEVDEVKEQLEDEILAKDKLVKA 1700
1701 KRALEVELEEVRDQLEEEEDSRSELEDSKRRLTTEVEDIKKKYDAEVEQN 1750
1751 TKLDEAKKKLTDDVDTLKKQLEDEKKKLNESERAKKRLESENEDFLAKLD 1800
1801 AEVKNRSRAEKDRKKYEKDLKDTKYKLNDEAATKTQTEIGAAKLEDQIDE 1850
1851 LRSKLEQEQAKATQADKSKKTLEGEIDNLRAQIEDEGKIKMRLEKEKRAL 1900
1901 EGELEELRETVEEAEDSKSEAEQSKRLVELELEDARRNLQKEIDAKEIAE 1950
1951 DAKSNLQREIVEAKGRLEEESIARTNSDRSRKRLEAEIDALTAQVDAEQK 2000
2001 AKNQQIKENKKIETELKEYRKKFGESEKTKTKEFLVVEKLETDYKRAKKE 2050
2051 AADEQQQRLTVENDLRKHLSEISLLKDAIDKLQRDHDKTKRELETETASK 2100
2101 IEMQRKMADFFGGFKA 2116
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.