 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching P29474 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.86 (see score help below)
1 MGNLKSVAQEPGPPCGLGLGLGLGLCGKQGPATPAPEPSRAPASLLPPAP 50
51 EHSPPSSPLTQPPEGPKFPRVKNWEVGSITYDTLSAQAQQDGPCTPRRCL 100
101 GSLVFPRKLQGRPSPGPPAPEQLLSQARDFINQYYSSIKRSGSQAHEQRL 150
151 QEVEAEVAATGTYQLRESELVFGAKQAWRNAPRCVGRIQWGKLQVFDARD 200
201 CRSAQEMFTYICNHIKYATNRGNLRSAITVFPQRCPGRGDFRIWNSQLVR 250
251 YAGYRQQDGSVRGDPANVEITELCIQHGWTPGNGRFDVLPLLLQAPDDPP 300
301 ELFLLPPELVLEVPLEHPTLEWFAALGLRWYALPAVSNMLLEIGGLEFPA 350
351 APFSGWYMSTEIGTRNLCDPHRYNILEDVAVCMDLDTRTTSSLWKDKAAV 400
401 EINVAVLHSYQLAKVTIVDHHAATASFMKHLENEQKARGGCPADWAWIVP 450
451 PISGSLTPVFHQEMVNYFLSPAFRYQPDPWKGSAAKGTGITRKKTFKEVA 500
501 NAVKISASLMGTVMAKRVKATILYGSETGRAQSYAQQLGRLFRKAFDPRV 550
551 LCMDEYDVVSLEHETLVLVVTSTFGNGDPPENGESFAAALMEMSGPYNSS 600
601 PRPEQHKSYKIRFNSISCSDPLVSSWRRKRKESSNTDSAGALGTLRFCVF 650
651 GLGSRAYPHFCAFARAVDTRLEELGGERLLQLGQGDELCGQEEAFRGWAQ 700
701 AAFQAACETFCVGEDAKAAARDIFSPKRSWKRQRYRLSAQAEGLQLLPGL 750
751 IHVHRRKMFQATIRSVENLQSSKSTRATILVRLDTGGQEGLQYQPGDHIG 800
801 VCPPNRPGLVEALLSRVEDPPAPTEPVAVEQLEKGSPGGPPPGWVRDPRL 850
851 PPCTLRQALTFFLDITSPPSPQLLRLLSTLAEEPREQQELEALSQDPRRY 900
901 EEWKWFRCPTLLEVLEQFPSVALPAPLLLTQLPLLQPRYYSVSSAPSTHP 950
951 GEIHLTVAVLAYRTQDGLGPLHYGVCSTWLSQLKPGDPVPCFIRGAPSFR 1000
1001 LPPDPSLPCILVGPGTGIAPFRGFWQERLHDIESKGLQPTPMTLVFGCRC 1050
1051 SQLDHLYRDEVQNAQQRGVFGRVLTAFSREPDNPKTYVQDILRTELAAEV 1100
1101 HRVLCLERGHMFVCGDVTMATNVLQTVQRILATEGDMELDEAGDVIGVLR 1150
1151 DQQRYHEDIFGLTLRTQEVTSRIRTQSFSLQERQLRGAVPWAFDPPGSDT 1200
1201 NSP 1203
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.