 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching P33076 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.78 (see score help below)
1 MRCLAPRPAGSYLSEPQGSSQCATMELGPLEGGYLELLNSDADPLCLYHF 50
51 YDQMDLAGEEEIELYSEPDTDTINCDQFSRLLCDMEGDEETREAYANIAE 100
101 LDQYVFQDSQLEGLSKDIFKHIGPDEVIGESMEMPAEVGQKSQKRPFPEE 150
151 LPADLKHWKPAEPPTVVTGSLLVGPVSDCSTLPCLPLPALFNQEPASGQM 200
201 RLEKTDQIPMPFSSSSLSCLNLPEGPIQFVPTISTLPHGLWQISEAGTGV 250
251 SSIFIYHGEVPQASQVPPPSGFTVHGLPTSPDRPGSTSPFAPSATDLPSM 300
301 PEPALTSRANMTEHKTSPTQCPAAGEVSNKLPKWPEPVEQFYRSLQDTYG 350
351 AEPAGPDGILVEVDLVQARLERSSSKSLERELATPDWAERQLAQGGLAEV 400
401 LLAAKEHRRPRETRVIAVLGKAGQGKSYWAGAVSRAWACGRLPQYDFVFS 450
451 VPCHCLNRPGDAYGLQDLLFSLGPQPLVAADEVFSHILKRPDRVLLILDG 500
501 FEELEAQDGFLHSTCGPAPAEPCSLRGLLAGLFQKKLLRGCTLLLTARPR 550
551 GRLVQSLSKADALFELSGFSMEQAQAYVMRYFESSGMTEHQDRALTLLRD 600
601 RPLLLSHSHSPTLCRAVCQLSEALLELGEDAKLPSTLTGLYVGLLGRAAL 650
651 DSPPGALAELAKLAWELGRRHQSTLQEDQFPSADVRTWAMAKGLVQHPPR 700
701 AAESELAFPSFLLQCFLGALWLALSGEIKDKELPQYLALTPRKKRPYDNW 750
751 LEGVPRFLAGLIFQPPARCLGALLGPSAAASVDRKQKVLARYLKRLQPGT 800
801 LRARQLLELLHCAHEAEEAGIWQHVVQELPGRLSFLGTRLTPPDAHVLGK 850
851 ALEAAGQDFSLDLRSTGICPSGLGSLVGLSCVTRFRAALSDTVALWESLQ 900
901 QHGETKLLQAAEEKFTIEPFKAKSLKDVEDLGKLVQTQRTRSSSEDTAGE 950
951 LPAVRDLKKLEFALGPVSGPQAFPKLVRILTAFSSLQHLDLDALSENKIG 1000
1001 DEGVSQLSATFPQLKSLETLNLSQNNITDLGAYKLAEALPSLAASLLRLS 1050
1051 LYNNCICDVGAESLARVLPDMVSLRVMDVQYNKFTAAGAQQLAASLRRCP 1100
1101 HVETLAMWTPTIPFSVQEHLQQQDSRISLR 1130
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.