 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching P33289 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.40 (see score help below)
1 MPGITETSQVTGPVLAHVIVTEDPYDASERAFLSTDLYELLFEDYANGSK 50
51 SGLTLISIQLMGSSLFNEFQTFKVYESEEQLPPNTVNLCNMGNIIDYSSD 100
101 FTVDSGYVARVDSLVKLDTVIISVLPEVYSLASQSQHQLVDILGGNDQHT 150
151 VIRQGDYNKDINGKISLCEPTDQGFLESTTKIIVVKENSLNLPLLDQSQD 200
201 GSLNYEENVKMNLEHSISNYFSLNSLDPENQITTTGVEFSVKCLDSPISV 250
251 RKTAKSISVAHDSEDESSPKLVEEDISNEDTLLYAFCKTTELAKIGCLSG 300
301 DIVKMKSGQCQCTTFECNCESCPVQYRYIRIHAFTDPNTYEKGCIYLNPI 350
351 LSFNLNNPKIVKLCPISIPDKRFELQGFHFSKFIPLAKQVTIARVSSPVT 400
401 LDRTLQTLFLTNLKTYFESGRKVLSKDQLIPIPVDTLLAKSIFSTYEKLG 450
451 VDDSQFPTVIPEGKPDAIAWFKVTEVSGELADSASQQFIIDPLKTKMMQS 500
501 GVVSCSPPKNSQHCNWANYLGCGQMFSFPNVSGVTTSTFEYAKTLRKLIK 550
551 ATIDPSRLVNLQTTVLLSSLSRAIGKSLLVHSLALECGVHLVEIDGYEVL 600
601 NPSSESKTIGTIRGKLDRVVEGCTPLIVFIKHIEALTKKSEQQQKDSLAV 650
651 KINELIDEYTAKPGVLFVASTNDSDNLSDELRAKFKFEIVLGVPSEQERT 700
701 LIFKYLIDFDQKTTPKVTEGTRELSFAPRNDLSLSSLSLQSAGLTPRDLI 750
751 SIVENAKTLAVDRVESLAKHHNVSFENMVYSSGGYIKFTPEDVEKSINTA 800
801 RNKFSDSIGAPRIPNVKWEDVGGLDVVKDEILDTIDMPMKHPELFSNGIK 850
851 KRSGILFYGPPGTGKTLLAKAIATNFALNFFSVKGPELLNMYIGESEANV 900
901 RKVFQRARDAKPCVVFFDELDSVAPKRGNQGDSEGVMDRIVSQLLAELDG 950
951 MSGGDGGDGVFVVGATNRPDLLDEALLRPGRFDKMLYLGVSDTHEKQSKI 1000
1001 MEALSRKFHLHPSVDLDKVAESCPFTFTGADFYALCSDAMLNAMTRIANT 1050
1051 VDEKIKRYNEELPEKSQVSTRWWFDNVATKEDIDVLVTLEDFDKSRKELV 1100
1101 PSVSAEELDHYLRVRQNFEGGKEKKVVQENGQTEHFSNGSANNHITFGDE 1150
1151 QVVEAIDENGNSIIA 1165
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.