 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching P35458 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.86 (see score help below)
1 MAQSRRHPHGRASSAGPRMSTEASSKPLKVGSRVEVIGKGHRGTVAYVGA 50
51 TLXATGKWVGVILDEAKGKNDGTVQGRKYFTCEENHGIFVRQSQIQVFED 100
101 GADTTSPETPESAALKVPKRHSRXAAKGSKLRGAKPKKTTARRPKPTRTP 150
151 TSAPSSGTAGPSGSASASGGEMSSSEPSTPAQTPLVAPVIPSPSLTSPVA 200
201 PMVPSPTKEEENLRSQVRDLEEKLETLKIKRNEDKAKLKELEKYKIQLEQ 250
251 VQEWKSKMQEQQADLQRRLKEAKKEAKDALEAKERYMEEMADTADAIEMA 300
301 TLDKEMAEERAESLQQEVDSLKEKVEYLTMDLEILKHEIEEKGSDGAASS 350
351 YQVKQLEEQNARLKEALVRMRDLSASEKQEHVKLQKQMEKKNTELESLRQ 400
401 QREKLQEEVKQAEKTVDELKEQVDAALGAEEMVETLTERNLDLEEKVREL 450
451 RETVGDLEAMNEMNDELQENARETELELREQLDLAAARVREAEKRVEAAQ 500
501 ETVADYQQTIKKYRELTAHLQDVNRELMSQQEASAEKQQQPPPEIFDFKI 550
551 KFAETKAHAKAIEMELRQMEVQQANRHVSLLTSFMPDSFLRHGGDHDCIL 600
601 VLLLIPRLICKADVISKQAQEKFELNENCTARAGLRGAAGEQLSFAAGLV 650
651 YSLSLLQATLHKYEQALNKCSVEVYKKVGMLYPEMSVHERSLDFLIELLH 700
701 KDQLDETVNVEPLTKAIKYYQHLYSIHLAEQAEDCTMQLADHIKFTQSAL 750
751 DCMGVEVCRLRAFLQAGQEASDLAILLKDLETSCSDIRQFCKKIRRRMPG 800
801 TDAPGIPAALGFGQQVSDTLLDCRKHLTWVVAVLQEVAAAGAQLIAPLAE 850
851 NGAAGGEAGGLGLQSQRADLQRSGHQPLRVPAPVLQHPHCHHEQDATAMQ 900
901 EGEYDADRPQSKPTPPAELRAAALRAEITDAEGLGLKLEDRETVIKELKK 950
951 SLKIKGEELSEANVRLSLLEKKLDSASKDADDRVEKIQTKLDETQTLLKK 1000
1001 KEKEFEETMDALQADIDQLESEKVELKQRLNNQSKRTIEGLRGAPASGVA 1050
1051 SIVSGIAGEEQQRGVGAGQAAGGSAGPVQVKDSPLLLQQIEALQLSIRHL 1100
1101 KNENNRLKGAQMKLELAGLKPLQVAKVSLPQSKQGEGPATLTLYRKSTQL 1150
1151 LETLYQMSTNAKVVDTKQTKSGRSGARLLEQTARLWAMKGSIEALRTRPC 1200
1201 GRWCSSSRARASPPASACSPPRPS 1224
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.