| Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching P36607 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.98 (see score help below)
1 MKRKVQKIIDEAPLEENSPPRFFDSDVEADSKPNDLTAANSIVDLKTNSQ 50
51 HENANAAGKEYGDSGVSESWVLDFLSVTGEKTISEFLAQKIWKTSNGDLN 100
101 VAVDMYFDESFNIKNSNPDSESQKDTDASLTQMDQLSNTVSVKDLSINRN 150
151 TNKKALNAVSPSLNLSSNSSVQDVSIDKEEMMKKQSRNALTPLDFIMKKN 200
201 ELMKYIGCFGVEAYSTASGTRTLQAGERIYLERQKLSIKSQSRNSRKKSK 250
251 LLSINSSCYSNIVRFCNSDHHEIGKLPTEVASVISTLMEQGFWSFEAICI 300
301 YSDNIIRFGSNVTLQVYCFINVNHPSLNRSPFTLATNSMQEEEEHLKASF 350
351 AQNKRDHLLRLFTWIALEPDLEDCNTKESIHIDDILKTSSLPEARDESNS 400
401 DLTPSSTEDEEDVVSDQLAILYDKVKTSGAELPSAPKPSTFALDLREYQK 450
451 QALYWMCCKEEGVQSDGSAPKLHPLWSRFRFPKDSEFPEFFKCSSDDDNT 500
501 HFYVNLYTGETTMLFPNSMPYHRGGILADEMGLGKTIEVLSLIHSRPCFS 550
551 TDEIPEAFRHSKPSLPVASRTTLVVAPMSLLDQWHSEACKVSQGTKFRSM 600
601 IYYGSEKPLDLKSCVIDTSTAPLIIITSYGVLLSEFSQQSHSSGLFSVHW 650
651 FRVVLDEGHNIRNRESKTAKACHSISSQNRWVITGTPIVNKLDDLYSLIK 700
701 FMRYEPWCNYTYWQTFVSLPYQSKDVLKALNVVQSILEFLVLRRTKETKD 750
751 RNGNSIVTLPPKTVKIEYLDFSDSERKIYDSLYTKAKSTVNANIVAGTLF 800
801 RNYTTILGLLLRLRQACCDPVLLSNMTINSETFDDFEFSVEQFNSLINQF 850
851 VVTGKPIPSDILKIDTLKSFEALITECPICCNEPIQNPLLLNCKHACCGD 900
901 CLSEHIQYQKRRNIIPPLCHTCRQPFNEQDVYKPFFVKNNGTQSTLLVGE 950
951 EVKWKYWNRLQSVKLNGLLGQLRQLTHSSEPEKVVIFSQFTTFLDIIADV 1000
1001 LESEKMGYARFDGTMSQQMRSTALETFRNDPDVNVLIISLKAGGVGLNLT 1050
1051 CANHVFIMDPWWSWSVEAQAIDRIHRLGQEKPVFVTRYIVRDTVEERMLK 1100
1101 IQERKNFITGTLGMSEGKQQVQSIEDIKMLFEY 1133
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.