 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching P42356 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.78 (see score help below)
1 MAAAPARGGGGGGGGGGGCSGSGSSASRGFYFNTVLSLARSLAVQRPASL 50
51 EKVQKLLCMCPVDFHGIFQLDERRRDAVIALGIFLIESDLQHKDCVVPYL 100
101 LRLLKGLPKVYWVEESTARKGRGALPVAESFSFCLVTLLSDVAYRDPSLR 150
151 DEILEVLLQVLHVLLGMCQALEIQDKEYLCKYAIPCLIGISRAFGRYSNM 200
201 EESLLSKLFPKIPPHSLRVLEELEGVRRRSFNDFRSILPSNLLTVCQEGT 250
251 LKRKTSSVSSISQVSPERGMPPPSSPGGSAFHYFEASCLPDGTALEPEYY 300
301 FSTISSSFSVSPLFNGVTYKEFNIPLEMLRELLNLVKKIVEEAVLKSLDA 350
351 IVASVMEANPSADLYYTSFSDPLYLTMFKMLRDTLYYMKDLPTSFVKEIH 400
401 DFVLEQFNTSQGELQKILHDADRIHNELSPLKLRCQANAACVDLMVWAVK 450
451 DEQGAENLCIKLSEKLQSKTSSKVIIAHLPLLICCLQGLGRLCERFPVVV 500
501 HSVTPSLRDFLVIPSPVLVKLYKYHSQYHTVAGNDIKISVTNEHSESTLN 550
551 VMSGKKSQPSMYEQLRDIAIDNICRCLKAGLTVDPVIVEAFLASLSNRLY 600
601 ISQESDKDAHLIPDHTIRALGHIAVALRDTPKVMEPILQILQQKFCQPPS 650
651 PLDVLIIDQLGCLVITGNQYIYQEVWNLFQQISVKASSVVYSATKDYKDH 700
701 GYRHCSLAVINALANIAANIQDEHLVDELLMNLLELFVQLGLEGKRASER 750
751 ASEKGPALKASSSAGNLGVLIPVIAVLTRRLPPIKEAKPRLQKLFRDFWL 800
801 YSVLMGFAVEGSGLWPEEWYEGVCEIATKSPLLTFPSKEPLRSVLQYNSA 850
851 MKNDTVTPAELSELRSTIINLLDPPPEVSALINKLDFAMSTYLLSVYRLE 900
901 YMRVLRSTDPDRFQVMFCYFEDKAIQKDKSGMMQCVIAVADKVFDAFLNM 950
951 MADKAKTKENEEELERHAQFLLVNFNHIHKRIRRVADKYLSGLVDKFPHL 1000
1001 LWSGTVLKTMLDILQTLSLSLSADIHKDQPYYDIPDAPYRITVPDTYEAR 1050
1051 ESIVKDFAARCGMILQEAMKWAPTVTKSHLQEYLNKHQNWVSGLSQHTGL 1100
1101 AMATESILHFAGYNKQNTTLGATQLSERPACVKKDYSNFMASLNLRNRYA 1150
1151 GEVYGMIRFSGTTGQMSDLNKMMVQDLHSALDRSHPQHYTQAMFKLTAML 1200
1201 ISSKDCDPQLLHHLCWGPLRMFNEHGMETALACWEWLLAGKDGVEVPFMR 1250
1251 EMAGAWHMTVEQKFGLFSAEIKEADPLAASEASQPKPCPPEVTPHYIWID 1300
1301 FLVQRFEIAKYCSSDQVEIFSSLLQRSMSLNIGGAKGSMNRHVAAIGPRF 1350
1351 KLLTLGLSLLHADVVPNATIRNVLREKIYSTAFDYFSCPPKFPTQGEKRL 1400
1401 REDISIMIKFWTAMFSDKKYLTASQLVPPDNQDTRSNLDITVGSRQQATQ 1450
1451 GWINTYPLSSGMSTISKKSGMSKKTNRGSQLHKYYMKRRTLLLSLLATEI 1500
1501 ERLITWYNPLSAPELELDQAGENSVANWRSKYISLSEKQWKDNVNLAWSI 1550
1551 SPYLAVQLPARFKNTEAIGNEVTRLVRLDPGAVSDVPEAIKFLVTWHTID 1600
1601 ADAPELSHVLCWAPTDPPTGLSYFSSMYPPHPLTAQYGVKVLRSFPPDAI 1650
1651 LFYIPQIVQALRYDKMGYVREYILWAASKSQLLAHQFIWNMKTNIYLDEE 1700
1701 GHQKDPDIGDLLDQLVEEITGSLSGPAKDFYQREFDFFNKITNVSAIIKP 1750
1751 YPKGDERKKACLSALSEVKVQPGCYLPSNPEAIVLDIDYKSGTPMQSAAK 1800
1801 APYLAKFKVKRCGVSELEKEGLRCRSDSEDECSTQEADGQKISWQAAIFK 1850
1851 VGDDCRQDMLALQIIDLFKNIFQLVGLDLFVFPYRVVATAPGCGVIECIP 1900
1901 DCTSRDQLGRQTDFGMYDYFTRQYGDESTLAFQQARYNFIRSMAAYSLLL 1950
1951 FLLQIKDRHNGNIMLDKKGHIIHIDFGFMFESSPGGNLGWEPDIKLTDEM 2000
2001 VMIMGGKMEATPFKWFMEMCVRGYLAVRPYMDAVVSLVTLMLDTGLPCFR 2050
2051 GQTIKLLKHRFSPNMTEREAANFIMKVIQSCFLSNRSRTYDMIQYYQNDI 2100
2101 PY 2102
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.