 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching P52918 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.81 (see score help below)
1 MDSTGASQIVSALDVIYSPKSNNSQRQEAQKFLDEVKLCSESPFWGYEIA 50
51 LQNPTNSILKYFGLGLLDHAVKKNWNDYDEGKRVALRKWVMELNFGVQDY 100
101 DTRYIKEKLATLWVEVAKRTWGEALKQTNPTEEQLLTSWVDMDNNLFELW 150
151 NINQSSRELALIIFRILFEDVFLLDDLIVLKRMTVIQPLCVMIVCPIEVF 200
201 AIKYKFSDKWTKFKANEEGWFSVWIPELNNALQQNNSEYIIRLLETLKTC 250
251 LNWPLTEVIVRNDVLSSLLTCLSSNIPRAQSMALDSIHILLTRPYSNESH 300
301 YQMTIDRVFDNMDLLDSVYESLLFDPTDDIDETKYPIIKKFVDMISCLYV 350
351 CVPKIKETNGQIQKYFKLVLKTTYNPSLIVSGLTLDLWCTCLRNDEYLPK 400
401 LEKYVIPDLLQFAADALVYYEQIDGHISKKFAEIDFQSKSEFQTFCSTYR 450
451 KRIRDIIRLISCVELDLTYDWLNNRLNNYFSSPFGQQVLSSTFLDHKLEP 500
501 YLGALSQYMIVECFINGCIRWKIWYPTGDDYDEKLDSILQKLEILSNQLI 550
551 ALNLREPLLLKKQIQNFALFLTMLKDNVLFTLLEKIITSATMDYPEINLE 600
601 ERGAESDAVRDLRYACGIELNRMALLMPESLKKIYPDLESVIARIMPNLS 650
651 YHEKISFKSFLLIIVLKSSLDMKEERFAAIVDPELLAWSDKTTVVGLSDL 700
701 HWFMERLGIVQIAEYFQRRDIDENSDLLSIPIDDEGKELKSELTKRWQSL 750
751 FPVRATRMFIHYSMQSIKTDEEFKMLQDLWRPRIVPILPYITRLLYQLQS 800
801 YHDPDNWKGLPTVVQSFVKYSTIERFWEAGASNKSKDEFIDEHMKAMQTL 850
851 RDFADSVGHIIRYTREYTLLVLSAISSLGSVFYLLDESPDLLLNSIAIFK 900
901 PGSNEISPGVSTHGWKHIMNIAIRPILKGCPKDCLGKFMPAFLPKLFEIL 950
951 DLLLCQKWSSHMNDMDMNPVPTDDDQMTEEILEENLLRQLTTVVVRIVID 1000
1001 CVGQGNANPNSAKSRLNNHQMEMRKIIFNDLNTLAPFLKLLNHLISFKDT 1050
1051 KCSFNSILVMKCCLTSVLNQNNTVDEYFTFEVMKNLLLNVLCNSAFKDSF 1100
1101 HEALYAFTVIFLTLCKEYPSARAFLFEISNGYNIDELYRNLRSVDEYKTQ 1150
1151 RALMIDFIDWVKSTSGKEDGNVDHAGDERKRQEKREAILKKANERLIKKN 1200
1201 KENGDMLDDPNIEDGAVGNLFDDN 1224
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.