 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching P53621 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.36 (see score help below)
1 MLTKFETKSARVKGLSFHPKRPWILTSLHNGVIQLWDYRMCTLIDKFDEH 50
51 DGPVRGIDFHKQQPLFVSGGDDYKIKVWNYKLRRCLFTLLGHLDYIRTTF 100
101 FHHEYPWILSASDDQTIRVWNWQSRTCVCVLTGHNHYVMCAQFHPTEDLV 150
151 VSASLDQTVRVWDISGLRKKNLSPGAVESDVRGITGVDLFGTTDAVVKHV 200
201 LEGHDRGVNWAAFHPTMPLIVSGADDRQVKIWRMNESKAWEVDTCRGHYN 250
251 NVSCAVFHPRQELILSNSEDKSIRVWDMSKRTGVQTFRRDHDRFWVLAAH 300
301 PNLNLFAAGHDGGMIVFKLERERPAYAVHGNMLHYVKDRFLRQLDFNSSK 350
351 DVAVMQLRSGSKFPVFNMSYNPAENAVLLCTRASNLENSTYDLYTIPKDA 400
401 DSQNPDAPEGKRSSGLTAVWVARNRFAVLDRMHSLLIKNLKNEITKKVQV 450
451 PNCDEIFYAGTGNLLLRDADSITLFDVQQKRTLASVKISKVKYVIWSADM 500
501 SHVALLAKHAIVICNRKLDALCNIHENIRVKSGAWDESGVFIYTTSNHIK 550
551 YAVTTGDHGIIRTLDLPIYVTRVKGNNVYCLDRECRPRVLTIDPTEFKFK 600
601 LALINRKYDEVLHMVRNAKLVGQSIIAYLQKKGYPEVALHFVKDEKTRFS 650
651 LALECGNIEIALEAAKALDDKNCWEKLGEVALLQGNHQIVEMCYQRTKNF 700
701 DKLSFLYLITGNLEKLRKMMKIAEIRKDMSGHYQNALYLGDVSERVRILK 750
751 NCGQKSLAYLTAATHGLDEEAESLKETFDPEKETIPDIDPNAKLLQPPAP 800
801 IMPLDTNWPLLTVSKGFFEGTIASKGKGGALAADIDIDTVGTEGWGEDAE 850
851 LQLDEDGFVEATEGLGDDALGKGQEEGGGWDVEEDLELPPELDISPGAAG 900
901 GAEDGFFVPPTKGTSPTQIWCNNSQLPVDHILAGSFETAMRLLHDQVGVI 950
951 QFGPYKQLFLQTYARGRTTYQALPCLPSMYGYPNRNWKDAGLKNGVPAVG 1000
1001 LKLNDLIQRLQLCYQLTTVGKFEEAVEKFRSILLSVPLLVVDNKQEIAEA 1050
1051 QQLITICREYIVGLSVETERKKLPKETLEQQKRICEMAAYFTHSNLQPVH 1100
1101 MILVLRTALNLFFKLKNFKTAATFARRLLELGPKPEVAQQTRKILSACEK 1150
1151 NPTDAYQLNYDMHNPFDICAASYRPIYRGKPVEKCPLSGACYSPEFKGQI 1200
1201 CRVTTVTEIGKDVIGLRISPLQFR 1224
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.