 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching P55198 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.84 (see score help below)
1 MKEMVGGCCVCSDERGWAENPLVYCDGHACSVAVHQACYGIVQVPTGPWF 50
51 CRKCESQERAARVRCELCPHKDGALKRTDNGGWAHVVCALYIPEVQFANV 100
101 LTMEPIVLQYVPHDRFNKTCYICEEQGRESKAASGACMTCNRHGCRQAFH 150
151 VTCAQMAGLLCEEEVLEVDNVKYCGYCKYHFSKMKTSRHSSGGGGGGAGG 200
201 GGGSMGGGGSGFISGRRSRSASPSTQQEKHPTHHERGQKKSRKDKERLKQ 250
251 KHKKRPESPPSILTPPVVPTADKVSSSASSSSHHEASTQETSESSRESKG 300
301 KKSSSHSLSHKGKKLSSGKGVSSFTSASSSSSSSSSSSGGPFQPAVSSLQ 350
351 SSPDFSAFPKLEQPEEDKYSKPTAPAPSAPPSPSAPEPPKADLFEQKVVF 400
401 SGFGPIMRFSTTTSSSGRARAPSPGDYKSPHVTGSGASAGTHKRMPALSA 450
451 TPVPADETPETGLKEKKHKASKRSRHGPGRPKGSRNKEGTGGPAAPSLPS 500
501 AQLAGFTATAASPFSGGSLVSSGLGGLSSRTFGPSGSLPSLSLESPLLGA 550
551 GIYTSNKDPISHSGGMLRAVCSTPLSSSLLGPPGTSALPRLSRSPFTSTL 600
601 PSSSASISTTQVFSLAGSTFSLPSTHIFGTPMGAVNPLLSQAESSHTEPD 650
651 LEDCSFRCRGTSPQESLSSMSPISSLPALFDQTASAPCGGGQLDPAAPGT 700
701 TNMEQLLEKQGDGEAGVNIVEMLKALHALQKENQRLQEQILSLTAKKERL 750
751 QILNVQLSVPFPALPAALPAANGPVPGPYGLPPQAGSSDSLSTSKSPPGK 800
801 SSLGLDNSLSTSSEDPHSGCPSRSSSSLSFHSTPPPLPLLQQSPATLPLA 850
851 LPGAPAPLPPQPQNGLGRAPGAAGLGAMPMAEGLLGGLAGSGGLPLNGLL 900
901 GGLNGAAAPNPASLSQAGGAPTLQLPGCLNSLTEQQRHLLQQQEQQLQQL 950
951 QQLLASPQLTPEHQTVVYQMIQQIQQKRELQRLQMAGGSQLPMASLLAGS 1000
1001 STPLLSAGTPGLLPTASAPPLLPAGALVAPSLGNNTSLMAAAAAAAAVAA 1050
1051 AGGPPVLTAQTNPFLSLSGAEGSGGGPKGGTADKGASANQEKG 1093
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.