 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching P97527 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.41 (see score help below)
1 MASSWRLILFLSFTSCLSEYSEALSGLSTSYAALLRIKKSSTSSAFGSKS 50
51 RPRYSSPSLGTLSVSPPSWRGAAQQYHSPVNLYHSPDAFRQDESVDYGPV 100
101 FVQEPDDIIFPTDSDEKKVALNCEVRGNPSPTYRWLRNGTEIDLESDYRY 150
151 SMIDGTFIINNPSESRDSGLYQCLATNTFGSILSREATLQFAYLGNFSGR 200
201 TRSAVSVREGQGVVLMCSPPPHSPEIIYSWVFNEFPSFVAEDSRRFISQE 250
251 TGNLYISKVQTSDVGSYICLVKNAVTNARVLSPPTPLTLRNDGVMGEYEP 300
301 KIEVHFPTTVTAAKGTTVKMECFALGNPVPTITWMKVNGYIPSKSRLRKS 350
351 QAVLEIPNLQLDDAGIYECTAENSRGKNSFRGQLQIYTYPHWVQKLNDTQ 400
401 LDSGSPLQWECKATGKPRPTYRWLKNGAPLLPQSRVDTANGVLAIHSVNQ 450
451 SDAGMYQCLAENKYGAIYASAELKILASPPSFELNQVKKSIIVTKDREVL 500
501 IECKPQGSPKPAISWRKGDKAVRGNKRIAILPDGSLRILNASKADEGKYI 550
551 CQGVNIFGSAEIIASVSVKEPTRIELTPKRTELTVGESIVLNCKAMHDSS 600
601 LDVTFYWTLKGQPIDFEKEGGHFESIRAQASSADLMIRNILLMHAGRYGC 650
651 RVQTTADSVSDEAELLVRGPPGPPGVVIVEEITESTATLSWSPATDNHSP 700
701 ISSYNLQARSPFSLGWQTVKTVPEVITGDMESAMAVDLNPWVEYEFRVVA 750
751 TNPIGTGDPSIPSRMIRTNEAVPKTAPSNVSGGSGRRHELVIAWEPVSEE 800
801 FQNGEGFGYIVAFRPNGTRGWKEKMVTSSDASKFIYRDESVPPLTPFEVK 850
851 VGVYNNKGDGPFSQIVVICSAEGEPTAAPTDVTATSVSVSEIFVVWKHVK 900
901 ESLGRPQGFEIGYWKDTEPEDSAETVRTRGNESFVMLTGLEGDTLYHLTV 950
951 RAYNGAGYGPPSREVSATTKRHPPSEPPGNLRWEQQGSQVSLGWEPVRPL 1000
1001 ANESEVMGYKVFYRQEGHSKGQVIETQKPQAVVPLPEAGVYIIEVRAYSE 1050
1051 GGDGTASSQIRVPSYAGGKITSAQSTLHSLSKWSSVTLLLALMLPSSSW 1099
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.