 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q03350 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.34 (see score help below)
1 MLWALALLALGIGPRASAGDHVKDTSFDLFSISNINRKTIGAKQFRGPDP 50
51 GVPAYRFVRFDYIPPVNTDDLNRIVKLARRKEGFFLTAQLKQDRKSRGTL 100
101 LVLEGPGTSQRQFEIVSNGPGDTLDLNYWVEGNQHTNFLEDVGLADSQWK 150
151 NVTVQVASDTYSLYVGCDLIDSVTLEEPFYEQLEVDRSRMYVAKGASRES 200
201 HFRGLLQNVHLVFADSVEDILSKKGCQHSQGAEVNTISEHTETLHLSPHI 250
251 TTDLVVQGVEKAQEVCTHSCEELSNMMNELSGLHVMVNQLSKNLERVSSD 300
301 NQFLLELIGGPLKTRNMSACVQEGRIFAENETWVVDSCTTCTCKKFKTVC 350
351 HQITCSPATCANPSFVEGECCPSCSHSADSDEGWSPWAEWTECSVTCGSG 400
401 TQQRGRSCDVTSNTCLGPSIQTRTCSLGKCDTRIRQNGGWSHWSPWSSCS 450
451 VTCGVGNVTRIRLCNSPVPQMGGKNCKGSGRETKPCQRDPCPIDGRWSPW 500
501 SPWSACTVTCAGGIRERSRVCNSPEPQYGGKDCVGDVTEHQMCNKRSCPI 550
551 DGCLSNPCFPGAKCNSFPDGSWSCGSCPVGFLGNGTHCEDLDECAVVTDI 600
601 CFSTNKAPRCVNTNPGFHCLPCPPRYKGNQPFGVGLEDARTEKQVCEPEN 650
651 PCKDKTHSCHKNAECIYLGHFSDPMYKCECQIGYAGDGLICGEDSDLDGW 700
701 PNNNLVCATNATYHCIKDNCPKLPNSGQEDFDKDGIGDACDEDDDNDGVS 750
751 DEKDNCQLLFNPRQLDYDKDEVGDRCDNCPYVHNPAQIDTDNNGEGDACS 800
801 VDIDGDDVFNERDNCPYVYNTDQRDTDGDGVGDHCDNCPLMHNPDQIDQD 850
851 NDLVGDQCDNNEDIDDDGHQNNQDNCPYISNSNQADHDNDGKGDACDSDD 900
901 DNDGVPDDRDNCRLVFNPDQEDSDGDGRGDICKDDFDNDNVPDIDDVCPE 950
951 NNAITETDFRNFQMVPLDPKGTTQIDPNWVIRHQGKELVQTANSDPGIAV 1000
1001 GFDEFGSVDFSGTFYVNTDRDDDYAGFVFGYQSSSRFYVVMWKQVTQTYW 1050
1051 EDKPSRAYGYSGVSLKVVNSTTGTGEHLRNALWHTGNTEGQVRTLWHDPK 1100
1101 NIGWKDYTAYRWHLIHRPKTGYMRVLVHEGKQVMADSGPIYDQTYAGGRL 1150
1151 GLFVFSQEMVYFSDLKYECRDA 1172
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.