| Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q05858 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.97 (see score help below)
1 MEGGNAGCSRQLPERAGPAESEPDVFTTFAVRTLLGLTTKLESVTPKEEE 50
51 AVLKAFQPLHIDVNTQANNRYERNDNDGVDDSENQHCESCTSDQADPMSG 100
101 SRAEPELEPEPAGQNEILLPHLRSVQTSLSESDNDAILVQGTLVHTTSDT 150
151 ESDGESKDPDADETGTSKCGLNNAALSAVALDGNNQSKEESDSEGYGHSD 200
201 DTVGRDDTELHPPISQWLPRKLDSILEHDSSGKDRTLMDEQFSCLLATGE 250
251 CSPELSGEDQRPSADNVSFHKAALTERSFQLPAFFSGLRVRKKGLNTEDG 300
301 ETITEIKPRENDLALLKLRQPVKKSNITSGLTTKKKSSEPKASPTFLEQL 350
351 SHLLNIDVSKNDERTQDSGAGFGETEDSDEGPENKASGQTEPLFPSEEIK 400
401 SSPAESALDVFKALFTRPPKKETTADPSELEAIKRKMRNEKESLKAVFER 450
451 SKSKPGDGPSDKSPDLSPSEQDDKTPGRLQTVWPPPKANHEEVKVGLKYT 500
501 EAEYQAAILHLKREHKEEIETLKSQFELRVFHIRGEHAVSTAQLEETIAH 550
551 LKNELDNKLNRRNEEARDIGVSTEDDNLPKTYRNVCIQTDRETFIKPSEE 600
601 ENRAVKNNQIVPKKLNISSLTHSISTQGENKDSYDVPSSESVLSCQPKQM 650
651 LPPSPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPFSDSSLPGLVPPPPPLPTGPTSVTPHFAF 700
701 GPPLPPQLSEGCRDFQAPAPPAPPPLPGLGPPVPPPLPGSGLPPPPPPPG 750
751 PGLFFNSTLSSSQGPRKPAIEPSRPMKPLYWTRIQLQGSRKTAIPTLWES 800
801 LEEPDILDTTEFEYLFSKDTTQEKRKPLSETYEKKTKAKKIIKLLDGKRS 850
851 QTVGILISSLHLEMKDIQQAILCVDDSVVDLETLEALYENRAQKDELEKI 900
901 EQYYQTSKEEELKLLDKPEQFLYELSQIPNFTERAQCIIFQSVFSEGITS 950
951 VHRKVDIITRVSKALLNMTSVKEILGLILAFGNYMNGGNRTRGQADGFGL 1000
1001 EILPKLKDVKSRDNRINLVDYVVIYYLRHCDKEAGTDKSIFPLPEPQDFF 1050
1051 QASQVKFEDLIKDLRKLKRDLEASEKQMKLVCRESSEEHLQPFKEKLEEF 1100
1101 FQKAKEERKKEESSLENAQKCFEETVGYFGIKPKPGEKEITPNYVFTVWY 1150
1151 EFCSDFKTIWKRESKSISKERIKVAQQSVSKLTAEKKVETKKINPTASLK 1200
1201 ERLRQKEANVNAN 1213
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.