 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q08460 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.58 (see score help below)
1 MANGGGGGGGSSGGGGGGGGGSGLRMSSNIHANNLSLDASSSSSSSSSSS 50
51 SSSSSSSSSSVHEPKMDALIIPVTMEVPCDSRGQRMWWAFLASSMVTFFG 100
101 GLFIILLWRTLKYLWTVCCHCGGKTKEAQKINNGSSQADGTLKPVDEKEE 150
151 VVAAEVGWMTSVKDWAGVMISAQTLTGRVLVVLVFALSIGALVIYFIDSS 200
201 NPIESCQNFYKDFTLQIDMAFNVFFLLYFGLRFIAANDKLWFWLEVNSVV 250
251 DFFTVPPVFVSVYLNRSWLGLRFLRALRLIQFSEILQFLNILKTSNSIKL 300
301 VNLLSIFISTWLTAAGFIHLVENSGDPWENFQNNQALTYWECVYLLMVTM 350
351 STVGYGDVYAKTTLGRLFMVFFILGGLAMFASYVPEIIELIGNRKKYGGS 400
401 YSAVSGRKHIVVCGHITLESVSNFLKDFLHKDRDDVNVEIVFLHNISPNL 450
451 ELEALFKRHFTQVEFYQGSVLNPHDLARVKIESADACLILANKYCADPDA 500
501 EDASNIMRVISIKNYHPKIRIITQMLQYHNKAHLLNIPSWNWKEGDDAIC 550
551 LAELKLGFIAQSCLAQGLSTMLANLFSMRSFIKIEEDTWQKYYLEGVSNE 600
601 MYTEYLSSAFVGLSFPTVCELCFVKLKLLMIAIEYKSANRESRSRKRILI 650
651 NPGNHLKIQEGTLGFFIASDAKEVKRAFFYCKACHDDVTDPKRIKKCGCR 700
701 RLEDEQPPTLSPKKKQRNGGMRNSPNTSPKLMRHDPLLIPGNDQIDNMDS 750
751 NVKKYDSTGMFHWCAPKEIEKVILTRSEAAMTVLSGHVVVCIFGDVSSAL 800
801 IGLRNLVMPLRASNFHYHELKHIVFVGSIEYLKREWETLHNFPKVSILPG 850
851 TPLSRADLRAVNINLCDMCVILSANQNNIDDTSLQDKECILASLNIKSMQ 900
901 FDDSIGVLQANSQGFTPPGMDRSSPDNSPVHGMLRQPSITTGVNIPIITE 950
951 LAKPGKLPLVSVNQEKNSGTHILMITELVNDTNVQFLDQDDDDDPDTELY 1000
1001 LTQPFACGTAFAVSVLDSLMSATYFNDNILTLIRTLVTGGATPELEALIA 1050
1051 EENALRGGYSTPQTLANRDRCRVAQLALLDGPFADLGDGGCYGDLFCKAL 1100
1101 KTYNMLCFGIYRLRDAHLSTPSQCTKRYVITNPPYEFELVPTDLIFCLMQ 1150
1151 FDHNAGQSRASLSHSSHSSQSSSKKSSSVHSIPSTANRPNRPKSRESRDK 1200
1201 QNRKEMVYR 1209
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.