 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q10573 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.85 (see score help below)
1 MNSIKIDSSTKIVIEYIDKLRNCSNEKRQKVSSVIRPVDFPGISTQQLCD 50
51 ILIRFAYNGTYIDDVFRDHLLKLVVDKSITWNQVIHSVINTKTDRIYSKC 100
101 LQCELIREMVNYVQIKSFSDKLHADELISIMKPTVFFLAQLIQDVLSDED 150
151 ELEMIQIEYGDVRKAYYKPLEALSAFIHDDLCSSLLAFSEASEITHQLEL 200
201 CRDSFSKLRSPDKSATTLVEMLIERHIEKCKPVKFQYIPEGIALFDLKNP 250
251 SIRILIPIFACFKNHESSKLMAETIQTFAEIMRFYGPDVIFDILHGAILL 300
301 KCEESMDLLHFPKQHRADFRWQSTTFFYKKLPQIIEYLIRSEKLTVAEVQ 350
351 FGLEKALTDLSMMFDAADVAWQNASFLTLLNELEPVLGKTITDPLRLRRR 400
401 EHMKTNDQLLPFADTDNQLIENTDIDKLLNAVKEVMNLQFGQTEEFSKLF 450
451 VDKVKTGQTDNFDAITSILITEGRLMEVGKAFVLKNVEAQRSSAVGVNER 500
501 IQIFDDTFILLSRILIKNPSVSINMFVNGGPGKSDAEQTMFYKWSMRYVK 550
551 RVAKHRDPEPKDETEYIALRKEVEMLMRLANAEVGIEDDLENDVEEEMPE 600
601 VQEPNIETQNVDEISIPDPLHLLIENDPTVTAESKETEEVKFNPEGVEQM 650
651 DTNEKPAEISDSLIEPTLLEEPKDILENIIVPIIKVEAPKPDSPIKKKKD 700
701 PDVTWHEVHCPLPRISRRTARAYLAQMKEGIPFWKTDDPNLNIGSILAAI 750
751 PRLGQLLVDEHEEKRNRIDRKSAEENMTNILHAIESMPSLFLCLLEWLDC 800
801 EPESGARTSLAFTINLSLERYLAVSTHGINYMKWIFIKSTVQQMIDELVD 850
851 KSPAFPEVTCTAFSTARRFCPFVGRNENPDQLKLKHAWYYMRQQAWASPH 900
901 ALRLLEHANTAREYDVWSHIYISKTIKSGCGDIMTSSVDMIFSFLMLDDL 950
951 NSIIRIHESLMAFWLSEDAGQCQADGRFDPLSIRVVIRLMTQVLLIAEWT 1000
1001 LDRLLNEDPAFVERLNLKEVKAPEPEDPDKREKWIFLLRSMLERTINRFF 1050
1051 KIVRKGLLSNVVNTIIQLLKSIAGSADCKAKRLLVKRIPPDLIFQLAYIE 1100
1101 PSSVDYSLMNIYCDPDNKEHTQTKIMFLCALRRSQSFSF 1139
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.