 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q29450 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.20 (see score help below)
1 MPAKGRYFLNEGEEGPDQDALYEKYRLTSQHGPLLLMLLLVAIAACTTLI 50
51 VITFSYGDPSRHRAVLGTAFFTLAMFVLLYALVYVECLDRRGLRISALLI 100
101 WGCLVTLGYVLVFDFDSPRKDTLCLWGRCPSSSFVVFVVYTLLPFSMWGA 150
151 VTAGLVSSISHLLVLAMHQEDFTSPVGLKLLATAVVFVCGNLTGAFHKHH 200
201 MQDASHDLFTYTVKCIQIRRKLRIEKRQQENLLLSVLPAHISMGMKLAII 250
251 ERLKERGDRRYLPDNNFHNLYVKRHQNVSILYADIVGFTRLASDCSPKEL 300
301 VVVLNELFGKFDQIAKANECMRIKILGDCYYCVSGLPVSLPNHARNCVKM 350
351 GLDMCEAIKQVREATGVDISMRVGIHSGNVLCGVIGLRKWQYDVWSHDVS 400
401 LANRMEAAGVPGRVHITEATLKHLDKAYEVEDGHGQQRDPYLKEMNIRTY 450
451 LVIDPRSQQPPQPSQHNSKNKGNATLKMRASVRMTRYLESWGAARPFAHL 500
501 NQRESVSSSETLVSHGRRPKAVPLRRHRTPDRSASPKGRSEDDSYDDEML 550
551 SAIEGLSSTRPCCSKSDDFSTFGSIFLEKGFEREYRLAPIPRVRYYFACA 600
601 SLVFVCILLIHVLLLYSMKTLGVSFGLVACVLGLVLGLCFADVFLRCCPA 650
651 LGKLRAIAESVETQPLLRVSLAILTIGSLLVIAVVNLPLMPFRDRGLTAG 700
701 NETGLRAVSGWEMSPCYLLPYYTCSCILAFIACSVFLRMSLELKVVLLTV 750
751 ALVAYLVLFNVYPSWQWDCCGHSLGNLTGTNGTLSSSSCSWHLKTMTNFY 800
801 LVLFYTTLIMLSRQIDYYCRLDCLWKKKFKKEHEEFETMENVNRLLLENV 850
851 LPAHVAAHFIGDKLNEDWYHQSYDCVCVMFASVPDFKVFYTECDVNKEGL 900
901 ECLRLLNEIIADFDELLLKPKFSGVEKIKTIGSTYMAAAGLSVPSGPENQ 950
951 DLERQHAHIGIMVEFSTALMSKLDGINRHSFNSFRLRVGINHGPVIAGVI 1000
1001 GARKPQYDIWGNTVNVASRMESTGELGKIQVTEETCTILQGLGYSCECRG 1050
1051 LIDVKGKGELRTYFVCTDTAKFQGLGLN 1078
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.