 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q40762 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.48 (see score help below)
1 MSTTRPRAATHSASSGSVSRSSKHSARVITQTPVDAKLQAEFEGSVHSFD 50
51 YTKSIDISGDSSSVPSETVKAYLQRLQKEMLIQPFGCVLAVEEGSCAVVG 100
101 YSENAPEMLDVVGGAHAVPSIGGQQQEGGGGGGGLLRIGMDARTLFKPAS 150
151 AAALQKAATFADMHLVNPIFVRCNRSGKPFYAILNRIDAGLVIDFEPVMP 200
201 SDVPVSAAGALQSYKLAAKAISRLQSLPGGDIRLLCDTVVQEVRELTGYD 250
251 RVMAYRFHEDEHGEVVAEMRRPDLEPYLGLHYPATDIPQASRFLFMKNRV 300
301 RMICDCCAPPVNVIQDKRLRQPLSLCGSTLRAPHGCHAQYMANMGSIASL 350
351 VMSVTTNENGDDSEGGGQQQPQNRRKLWGLVVCHHTSPRVIPFPLRYACE 400
401 FLMQVFGIQLNKEVELAAQLREKHILRVQPVLCDMLLRDAPVGIVSQTPN 450
451 IMDLVKCDGAALLYGKRLWLLGTTPTEAQILDIADWLLEHHRDSTGLSTD 500
501 SLAEAGYPGAASLGDAVCGIAAARITSKDFLFWFRSHTAKEIIWGGAKHD 550
551 PNDKDDGRRMHPRSSFKAFLEVVKRRSLPWEDVEMDAIHSLQLILRDSFH 600
601 DIDDSDSKTMIHARLNDLRLQGIDELSAVTNEMVRLIETATVPILAIDSN 650
651 GLVNGWNTKAAELTGLLADEVIGRPLIDLVQHDSVEIVKKMLYLALQGEE 700
701 EQNVEIKLKTFGIQEEKGPVVLIVNACSSRDLEENVVGVCFVAQDVTWQR 750
751 IAMDKFTHLQGDYRAIVQNPNPLIPPIFGADEYGYCSEWNPAMEKLTGWK 800
801 REEVIGKMLVGEVFGIHRMSCQLKGQDGLTKLRIVLNNAMAGKETEKFPF 850
851 SFFDRHGKNTEALLSANKRTDAEGIITGVFCFLHVTSTELQQALQVQRMA 900
901 EQAAMDRLKELAYIRQEIRNPLYGIIFTRKLMESTDLSEEQKQIVQTSAL 950
951 CQRQLVKVLDDADLESIEDGYLELDTIEFTLGTVLDAVVSQGMILSREKG 1000
1001 LQLIRDSPEEIKTMCLYGDQLRLQQILSNFLINALRFSTSEGWVGNKVVP 1050
1051 TKRHLGSGVNVMHMEFRITHSGQGIPEELIKEMFVHNQDMFQEGLGLYMC 1100
1101 QQLVKIMNGDVQYLREAGRSSFIINVEFPLAQTDKQ 1136
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.