 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q5RJH6 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.77 (see score help below)
1 MSLQSAQYLRQAEVLKAEMTDSKLGPAEVWTSRQALQDLYQKMLVTDLEY 50
51 ALDKKVEQDLWNHAFKNQITTLQGQAKNRANPNRSEVQANLSLFLEAASG 100
101 FYTQLLQELCTVFNVDLPCRVKSSQLGIISNKQTHSSTIVKPQSSSCSYI 150
151 CQHCLVHLGDIARYRNQTSQAESYYRHAAQLVPSNGQPYNQLAILASSKG 200
201 DHLTTIFYYCRSIAVKFPFPAASTNLQKALSKALESRDELKTKWGVSDFI 250
251 KAFIKFHGHVYLSKSLEKLSPLREKLEEQFKRLLFQKAFNSQQLVHVTVI 300
301 NLFQLHHLRDFSNETEQHSYSQDEQLCWTQLLALFMSFLGILCKCPLQND 350
351 SQESNNAYPLPAVKVSMDWLRLRPRVFQEAVVDERQYIWPWLISLLNSFH 400
401 PREDDLSNTNATPLPEEFELQGFLALRPSFRNLDFSKGHQGITGDKEGQQ 450
451 RRIRQQRLISIGKWIADNQPRLIQCENEVGKLLFITEIPELILEDPSEAK 500
501 ENLILQETSVVESLATDGSPGLKSVLSTGRNPSNSCDSGEKPVVTFKENI 550
551 KPREVNQGRSFPPKEVKSQTELRKTPVSEARKTPVTQTPSQTSNSQFIPI 600
601 HHPGAFPPLPSRPGFPPPTYVIPPPVAFSMGSGYTFPAGVSVPGTFLQST 650
651 AHSPAGNQVQAGKQSHIPYSQQRPSGPGPMNQGPQQSQPPSQPPLTSLPA 700
701 QPTAQSTSQLQVQALAQQQQSPTKVIPALGKSPPHHSGFQQYQQADASKQ 750
751 LWNPPQVQSPLGKIMPVKQSYYLQTQDPIKLFEPSLQPPVIQQQPLEKKM 800
801 KPFPMEPYNHNPSEVKVPEFYWDSSYSMADNRAVMAQQPNMDRRSKRSPG 850
851 VFRPEQDPVPRMPFEDPKSSPLLPPDLLKSLAALEEEEELIFSNPPDLYP 900
901 ALLGPLASLPGRSLFKSLLEKPSELMSHSSSFLSLTGFSVNQERYPNSSM 950
951 FNEVYGKNLTTSSKAELNPSVASQETSLYSLFEGTPWSPSLPASSDHSTP 1000
1001 ASQSPHSSNPSSLPSSPPTHNHNSAPFSNFGPIGTPDNRDRRPADRWKTD 1050
1051 KPAMGGFGVDYLSATSSSESSWHQASTPSGTWTGHGPSMEDSSAVLMESL 1100
1101 KSIWSSSMMHPGPSALEQLLMQQKQKQQRGQGAMNPPH 1138
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.