 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q60997 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.40 (see score help below)
1 MGISTVIFEICLLWGQILSTASQTAVPTDGTDSGLAVRLVNGGDRCQGRV 50
51 EILYQGSWGTVCDDSWDLNDANVVCRQLGCGLAVSAPGNARFGQGSGPIV 100
101 MDDVACGGYEDYLWRCSHRGWLSHNCGHQEDAGVICSDSQTSSPTPGWWN 150
151 PGGTNNDVFYPTEQTTAEQTTIPDYTPIGTDSGLAVRLVNGGDRCQGRVE 200
201 ILYQGSWGTVCDDSWDVSDANVVCRQLGCGWAVSAPGNAYFGQGQGPIVL 250
251 DDVACGGYENYLWSCSHQGWLSHNCGHQEDAGVICSASQSSSPTPGWWNP 300
301 GGTNNDVFYPTEQTTAGTDSGLAVRLVNGGDRCQGRVEILYQGSWGTVCD 350
351 DSWDTNDANVVCRQLGCGWAVSAPGNAYFGPGSGSIVLDDVACTGHEDYL 400
401 WRCSHRGWLSHNCGHHEDAGVICSASQSSSPTPDVFYPTDQTTAEQTTVP 450
451 DYTPIGTDSGLAVRLVNGGDRCQGRVEILYQGSWGTVCDDSWDLNDANVV 500
501 CRQLGCGLAVSAPGSARFGQGTGPIVMDDVACGGYEDYLWRCSHRGWLSH 550
551 NCGHHEDAGVICSASQSSSPTPDVFYPTDQTTAEQTTVPDYTPIGTDSGL 600
601 AVRLVNGGDRCQGRVEILYQGSWGTVCDDSWDLNDANVVCRQLGCGLAVS 650
651 APGSARFGQGTGPIVMDDVACGGYEDYLWRCSHRGWLSHNCGHHEDAGVI 700
701 CSASQSSSPTPDVFYPTDQTTAEQTTVPDYTTIGTENSLAVRLENGGDRC 750
751 QGRVEILYQGSWGTVCDDSWDLNDANVVCRQLGCGLAVSAPGSARFGQGT 800
801 GPIVMDDVACGGYEDYLWRCSHRGWLSHNCGHHEDAGVICSASQSSSPTP 850
851 DVFYPTDQTTVEQTTVPDYTPIGTENSLAVRLENGGDRCQGRVEILYQGS 900
901 WGTVCDDSWDTKDANVVCRQLGCGWAVSAPGNAYFGPGSGSIVLDDVACT 950
951 GHEDYLWSCSHRGWLSHNCGHHEDAGVICSDAQIQSTTRPDLWPTTTTPE 1000
1001 TTTELLTTTPYFDWWTTTSDYSCGGLLTQPSGQFSSPYYPSNYPNNARCS 1050
1051 WKIVLPNMNRVTVVFTDVQLEGGCNYDYILVYDGPEYNSSLIARVCDGSN 1100
1101 GSFTSTGNFMSVVFITDGSVTRRGFQAHYYSTVSTNYSCGGLLTQPSGQF 1150
1151 SSPYYPSNYPNNARCSWEILVPNMNRVTVVFTDVQLEGGCNYDYILVYDG 1200
1201 PQYNSSLIARVCDGSNGSFTSTGNFMSVVFITDGSVTRRGFQAHYYSTVS 1250
1251 TTPPVPIPTTDDYSCGGLLTLPSGQFSSPHYPSNYPNNARCSWEILVPNM 1300
1301 NRVTVAFTDVQLEGGCNYDYILVYDGPEYNSSLIARVCDGSNGSFTSTGN 1350
1351 FMSVVFITDGSVTRRGFQAHYYSTVSTNYSCGGLLTQPSGQFSSPHYPSN 1400
1401 YPNNVRCSWEILVPSMNRVTVAFTDVQLEGGCSFDYILVYDGPEYNSSLI 1450
1451 APVCDGFNGSFTSTGNFMSVVFITDGSVTRRGFQAYYYSTVSTPPSFHPN 1500
1501 ITGNDSSLALRLVNGSNRCEGRVEILYRGSWGTVCDDSWGISDANVVCRQ 1550
1551 LGCGSALSAPGNAWFGQGSGLIVLDDVSCSGYESHLWNCHHPGWLVHNCR 1600
1601 HSEDAGVICALPEVTSPSPGWWTTSPSYVNYTCGGFLTQPSGQFSSPFYP 1650
1651 GNYPNNARCLWNIEVPNNYRVTVVFRDLQLERGCSYDYIEIFDGPHHSSP 1700
1701 LIARVCDGSLGSFTSTSNFMSIRFITDHSITARGFQAHYYSDFDNNTTNL 1750
1751 LCQSNHMQASVSRSYLQSMGYSARDLVIPGWNSSYHCQPQITQREVIFTI 1800
1801 PYTGCGTIKQADNETINYSNFLRAVVSNGIIKRRKDLNIHVSCKMLQNTW 1850
1851 VNTMYITNNTVEIQEVQYGNFDVNISFYTSSSFLFPVTSSPYYVDLDQNL 1900
1901 YLQAEILHSDASLALFVDTCVASPHPNDFSSLTYDLIRSGCVRDDTYQSY 1950
1951 SSPSPRVSRFKFSSFHFLNRFPSVYLQCKLVVCRAYDTSSRCYRGCVVRS 2000
2001 KRDVGSYQEKVDVVLGPIQLQSPSKEKRSLDLAVEDVKKPASSQAVYPTA 2050
2051 AIFGGVFLAMVLAVAAFTLGRRTHIDRGQPPSTKL 2085
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.