| Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q63505 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.98 (see score help below)
1 MDALESLLDEVALEGLDGLCLPALWSRLESRSPAFPLPLEPYTQEFLWRA 50
51 LVTHPGISFYEEPRERPDLQLQDRYEEIDLETGILESRRDPVTLEDVYPI 100
101 HMILENKDGIQGSCRYFKERKDITSSIRSKCLQPRCTMVEAFSRWGKKLI 150
151 IVASQDMRYRALIGLEGDPDLKLPDFSYCILERLGRSRWQGELQRDLHTT 200
201 AFKVDAGKLHYHRKILNKNGLITMQSHVIRLPTGAQQHSILLLLNRFHVD 250
251 RRSKYDILMEKLSMMLSTRSNQIETLGKLREELGLCERTFKRLYQYMLNA 300
301 GLAKVVSLPLQEIHPECGPCKTKKGTDVMVRCLKLLKEFRRKMEDDHDDD 350
351 DDEEAISKAVPPVDIVFERDMLTQTYELIERRGTKGISQAEIRVAMNVGK 400
401 LEARMLCRLLQRFKVVKGFMEDEGRQRTTKYISCVFAEESDLSRQYAREK 450
451 ARGELLTTVSLASVQDESLMPEGEEAFLSDSESEEESSCSGKRRGRGSRG 500
501 HSRASGDAGPGSRPHHSTPAKGGWKVLNLHPLKKPKSAAVERSRRSSACR 550
551 DGLDTSSSSELNIPFDPHSMDSHSGDIAVIEEVRLDNPKEGGGSQKGGRH 600
601 GSGQDKPHKTYRLLKRRNLIIEAVTNLRLIESLFTIQKMIMDQEKQEGVS 650
651 TKCCKKSIIRLVRNLSEEGLLRLYRTTVIQDGIKKKVDLVVHPSMDQNDP 700
701 LVRSAIEQVRFRISNSSTANRVKVPPAPAPQEEAEEGNQEPEVPSRSADS 750
751 EANTSSKPESTRVKKTDEKMGITPLKNYKPVIVPGLGRSIGFLPKMPRLR 800
801 VMHLFLWYLVYGHPASHTGEQPTFHSERKTGKQEPSRPGVQPSSGDDWDS 850
851 SEAKNSTESSSWEAEMELSTERVYVDEISWMRYVPPIPIHRDFGFGWALV 900
901 SDILLCLPLSIFVQVVQVSYKVDNLEDFLNDPLKKHTLIRFLPRHIRQQL 950
951 LYKRRYIFSVVENLQRLCYMGLLQFGPTEKFQDKDQVFVFLKKNAVIVDT 1000
1001 TICDPHYNLAHSSRPFERRLYVLDSMQDVESYWFDLQCICLNTPLGVVRC 1050
1051 PCAQKICPDPGSDPEGSLRKEQESAMDKHNLERKCAMLEYTTGSREVVDE 1100
1101 GLVPGDGLGAAGLDSSFYAHLKRNWVWTSYIINKARKNNTSENGLTGRLQ 1150
1151 TFLSKRPMPLGSGGSGRLPLWSEGKADAELCADKEEHFELDREPTPGRNR 1200
1201 KVRGGKSQKRKRLKKEPIRKTKRRRRGEHPEAKSKKLRYQDEADQNALRM 1250
1251 MTRLRVSWSMQEDGLLMLCRIASNVLNTKVKGPFVTWQVVRDILHATFEE 1300
1301 SLDKTSHSVGRRARYIVKNPQAFMNYKVCLAEVYQDKALVGDFMSRKDNY 1350
1351 EDPKVCAKEFKEFVEKLKEKFSSGLRNPNLEIPDTLQELFAKYRVLAIGD 1400
1401 EKDRVRKEDELNSVEDIHFLVLQNLIQSTLSLSNSQSNSCQSFQIFRLYR 1450
1451 EFREPVLVRAFMECQKRSLVNRRRVSHSQGPKKNRAVPFVPMSYQLSQSY 1500
1501 YKLFTWRFPTTVCTESFQFYDRLRANGILDQPDHFSFKDMDSNDPSSDLV 1550
1551 AFSLDSPGGHCVTALALFSLGLLSVDVRIPEQIVVVDSSMVESEVMKSLG 1600
1601 KDGGLDDDDEEEDLDEGSGTKRQSVEVKAHQASHTKYLLMRGYYTVPGMV 1650
1651 STRNLNPNDSIVVNSCQVKFRLRNTPAPTHLGPTGPTATPLEELQAGPSC 1700
1701 LPASFTSLVDPQLHTRCPEEFAHQMAQSGYSPEDVAASLEILQAVAAADC 1750
1751 FGVDREKLSRQFSALEKIADKRTRTFLDYIQDLLEQQQVMEVGGNTVRLV 1800
1801 AMASAQPWLLPSVRLKDVEIDTKASGDDSQSRLPAGSSIEDHTSEGAPIP 1850
1851 PVSSNGTKKRPYCSIQSPETDAEEATRLPAKKPTLQDVCVAASPRPGTEE 1900
1901 QTEAQAQFAAPEDAGAEGPRQESQESVGVSGLEQLGCEFQLPENSEDPRG 1950
1951 LTESNMAQVAWESGCERVCFVGRPWRGVDGRLNMPVCKGMMEAVLYHIMS 2000
2001 RPGVPESCLLQYYQGVLQPVAVLELLRGLESLGCIQKRMLKKPASVSLFS 2050
2051 RPVVEGLGQASEAEALSCQGSTVTFYEPTLDCTIRLGRVFPHDINWKQSG 2100
2101 SIYRCVPGQQRSLCPCLIVPPGLSQEPRPSHSCYQSSAQPSTGVATSR 2148
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.