 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q64096 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.81 (see score help below)
1 MSDCWCFIFCKEHVRSNPLSPQHDGASREEADHQVDVSDGIRLVPDKAEA 50
51 TAATASDEIMHQDIVPLCAADIQEQLKKRFAYLSGGRGQDGSPVITFPDY 100
101 PAFSEIPDKEFQNVMTYLTSIPSLQDAGIGFILVIDRRQDKWTSVKASVL 150
151 RIAASFPANLQLVLVLRPTGFFQRTLSDIAFKFNRDEFKMKVPVMMLSSV 200
201 PELHGYIDKSQLTEDLGGTLDYCHSRWLCHRTAIESFALMVKQTAQMLQA 250
251 FGTELAETELPNDVQSTSLVLSAHTEKKAKVKEDLQLALKEGNSILESLR 300
301 EPLAESAAHSVNQDQLDNQATVQRLLAQLNETEAAFDEFWAKHQQKLEQC 350
351 LQLRHFEQGFREVKTTLDSMSQKIAAFTDVGNSLAHVQHLLKDLTAFEEK 400
401 SSVAVDKARALSLEGQQLIENRHYAVDSIHPKCEELQHLCDHFASEVTRR 450
451 RGLLSKSLELHSLLETSMKWSDEGIFLLASQPVDKCQSQDGAEAALQEIE 500
501 KFLETGAENKIQELNEIYKEYECILNQDLLEHVQKVFQKQESTEEMFHRR 550
551 QASLKKLAAKQTRPVQPVAPRPEALTKSPSPSPGSWRSSENSSSEGNALR 600
601 RGPYRRAKSEMSEPRQGRTSSTGEEEESLAILRRHVMNELLDTERAYVEE 650
651 LLCVLEGYAAEMDNPLMAHLISTGLQNKKNILFGNMEEIYHFHNRNIPAG 700
701 LESCIDCPELVGRCFLERMEEFQIYEKYCQNKPRSESLWRQCSDCPFFQE 750
751 CQKKLDHKLSLDSYLLKPVQRITKYQLLLKEMLKYSKHCEGAEDLQEALS 800
801 SILGILKAVNDSMHLIAITGYDGNLGDLGKLLMQGSFSVWTDHKKGHTKV 850
851 KELARFKPMQRHLFLHEKAVLFCKKREENGEGYEKAPSYSYKQSLNMTAV 900
901 GITENVKGDTKKFEIWYNAREEVYIIQAPTPEIKAAWVNEIRKVLTSQLQ 950
951 ACREASQHRALEQSHSLPLPTPSSTSPTKGNTRNVKKLEDRKTDPLSLEG 1000
1001 YVSSSLPKPPEKGKGWSKTSHSLEAPEEDGGWSSAEELINSSDAEEDGGV 1050
1051 GPKKLVPGKYTVVMDDEKGGPDTLAMRSGDMVEVVEEGAEGLWYVRDLTS 1100
1101 SKEGWVPASSLSTLLGKSSSAQCLSSSGKIHCARQLCPEPAEILSPEPV 1149
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.