| Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q641G3 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.99 (see score help below)
1 MAQFGGQKNPPPWATQFTATAVSQPGPLAVQQSSLLGASPTIYTQQSALA 50
51 AAGLASPSPANYQLSQTAALQQQAAAAAAAAAAALQQQYTQPQQTIYSVQ 100
101 QQLQPPPQAILTQPAVALPTSLALSTPQQAAQITVSYPTPRSNQQQTQPQ 150
151 KQRVFTGVVTKLHETFGFVDEDVFFQLTAVKGKSPQAGDRVLVEATYNPN 200
201 MPFKWNAQRIQTLPNQNPASAQSLIKNPAAVMQPVAQPTAYAVQTQPPPQ 250
251 AQTLLQAQISAATLTPLLQTQTSPLLQQPQQKAGLLQTPVRIVSQPQPVR 300
301 RIEPPSRFSVRNDRGDSILSRKDDRNRERERERRRSRDRSPQRKRSRERS 350
351 PRRERERSPRRPRRVVPRYTVQISKFCLDCPGCDTMELRRRYQNLYIPSD 400
401 FFDAQFTWVDAFPISRPFQLGNYSNFYIMHKEVDPLEKNTAIVDPPDADH 450
451 TYSAKVMLLASPSLEELYHKSCALAEDPIEVREGFQHPARLIKFLVGMKG 500
501 KDEAMAIGGHWSPSLDGPNPDKDPSVLIRTAVRCCKALTGIELSLCTQWY 550
551 RFAEIRYHRPEETHKGRTVPAHVETVVLFFPDVWHCLPTRSEWENLCHGY 600
601 KQQLVDKLQGDRKEADGEQEEEDKEDGDAKEISTPTHWSKLDPKIMKVND 650
651 LRKELESRTLSSKGLKSQLIARLTKQLRIEEQKEEQKELEKCEKEEEEEE 700
701 ERKSEDDKEEEERKRQEELERQRREKRYMLPDEPAIIVHPNWSAKNGKFD 750
751 CSIMSLSVLLDYRIEDNKEHSFEVSLFAELFNEMLQRDFGVRIYRELLAL 800
801 PEKEEKKDKEKKCKKEDKRERKEDKDDDDEPKPKRRKSSDDKIKLEEKEE 850
851 RKRDDRRKEDYREEDDPDYENQDDYEPIAAEEDDGDYDDREDDDDDSSSK 900
901 DKREDKRDGNRYSKERQSKDKEKDKKQMVTVNRDLLMAFVYFDQSHCGYL 950
951 LEKDLEEILYTLGLHLSRAQVKKLFTKILLKESLLYRKLTDTATEDGSHE 1000
1001 ETDPLHNDILGNCSLLPSKAVRTGLSTVEDKGGLIVYKGAMVDVGSLLQK 1050
1051 LEKSEKTRTELEHRLQTLESKTEEDEKTISQLEASNRNLSEELKQTKDDV 1100
1101 GHLKDSLKAAEDTRSLYEDQLTNTIKNLSAAMGEIQVVLNKNPSTTEDQK 1150
1151 SKENGSS 1157
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.