 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q6DD51 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.86 (see score help below)
1 MGRENELIQAVKSGDVGAVQKFLAKFRTPKSKLLGSTKRLNVNHQDADGF 50
51 SALHHAALSGNSELLLLLLEMQASVDIKDGNGMRPLHYAAWQGQPEPVRL 100
101 LLRASASVNAASHDGQIPLHLAAQYGHYEVSETLLQHQSNPCHVNKGKKT 150
151 PLDLACEFGRVKVVQLLLNSHLCVSLLEGTSKDPTDPNFTTPLHLAAKNG 200
201 HLEVIRLLLKLGIEINKVTKMGTALHEAALCGKTEVVKLLIENGVDVNIR 250
251 NTYNQTALDIVNQFTTTHASIDIKQLLREASGILKVRALKDFWNAHDPTA 300
301 LNIRAGDLITVLEQHPDGRWKGHIHDPQKGTDRVGFFPPSIVEVISKRLG 350
351 STLSRNITVPSHQHLAKTVLTLPIQHSPGSQLGINPDTSVAGDRHSVGSE 400
401 SSVRSAGSGQSCEGQQINTALLIENAQTMDFGSENLQNCQTFPGPVSGHH 450
451 LSTILPVEKNPGDYLQGKDAEQIFCWLRGFQMETYVGNFISAGYDLPTIM 500
501 RVTPEDLTAIGVTKPGHRKMISTEIGKLIVADGLPQQIPVDLWDWLSQLG 550
551 LPEYHKQLSENGYESLSTVTELTWEGLQEIGIHRLGHQKKLLLGVKRLLD 600
601 LQKGYPIGGTLRRRILGSQDTVAVVEPPENGDLPVTPKLLTFQGAELSQE 650
651 LQSALTRGNEQLCTGRRSFSQESISSRSQGSGHSQESASSYPVLPVHLQG 700
701 VDLNLPERNHPEGTDQILQNHWVPNGCLIQPEPPAPPPKPALKKRSLSAC 750
751 RYALSDGEPEEEEEKKIATAGTGTLSTYATLTRRPGRSCLTNGKPEKKVQ 800
801 RSQSFAVRARRKGPPPPPPKRLSSMSSAEGQSPEGQSSVKTIAAQLKDIG 850
851 RGTGFSASTSKATDTEVLEGSGTRRRTVSESAAGLGGRLSLPLTTKKDEE 900
901 EERKEEPISSQHSSSESIPFAEEGNLTIKQRPKPPGAKLEQDATSELSPT 950
951 QESQLQSAEAQRHLESSAVLAKPVTVVLAQARPQIAAKPQIGPKPDTGAR 1000
1001 APPATSIPKNEEHDFNLTESDTVKRRPKVKEKEEESPKAPLANNSPSLIP 1050
1051 SQEPLTQDTLIAKIADIDKRLLSLGEVEDSVKKTGIDTRSTGVSISQTHL 1100
1101 VISGPQQVLQKPSRAVTGPLFPAGSILWDEESEASSREQTCIPQQSISNS 1150
1151 DKGPPVFTSSLQNTEELQDTRGKSCRETVQLTKNILDDISTMFDDLAEQL 1200
1201 EAMLD 1205
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.