 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q6P5D4 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.91 (see score help below)
1 MTTAAERKYINIRKRLDQLGYRQTLSVDSLPLVEKLFSDLVHTTESLRQC 50
51 RLSSGKAEKESANLDFVLEPYKLENTRLNKENNELYLELMKLRECSDKHI 100
101 KDLKTTLKKCSRETADLKFLNNQYVHKVKVLEKESKAKDEKIQQLQEKNL 150
151 RAVVQTPGGRKRNIAFRRQRMQIDEPAPPSEVSAYPVPQPEDPYIADLLQ 200
201 VADNRIQELQEEVQQLQEKLAQMEKGVLDYSKQIELREREIQRLSLALDG 250
251 GCSPDVLSLETRNKTNEKLIAHLNVQVDFLQQANKELEKHIQELMETKET 300
301 VTTEVVNLSNRNEKLCQELTEIDQLAQRLERHKEQVLETADKELGEAKKE 350
351 IKRNLCEMRNLEEKMSKLQWELDLSHKEKERLNSELLLKSDLETVVHQLE 400
401 QEKQRLSKKLQSFAVTERELTLEVERMRLEHGIKRRDKSPSRLDTFLKGI 450
451 EEERDYYKKELEKLQHLIQRRSCAINYSAREKPPVVKCSEKGDCSTDVHL 500
501 ITRERDELQRMLERFEKYMEDIQSNVKLLTAERDKLNVLYKEAKEELSTL 550
551 RKESTNSTSPNHLVSCVEKEKERALSELRRITAEKEALREKLKNIQERNA 600
601 VGKSDLEKTIEHLTYINHQLENEKYELQSKMLMMKETVESLENKSKLQAQ 650
651 KLSHVTGDSSHQKTEMTSLRIVSEQLQRSLDDCQHRLSIKRGELESAQEQ 700
701 IKMLEQKLENLSHRMTVQSEETHAMKKTIGVMDKEKDFLQETVDEKTEKI 750
751 ANLQESLLSKEKVIAQLKVTVAEYETSLNQLQETLTTRDREINSLRRQLD 800
801 ASHKELDDVGKSREISFKENRRLQDDLATMARENQEISLELEAAVQEKEE 850
851 MKSRVHKYITEVSRWESLMAAKEKENKDLLDRFQMLHSRAEDWEVKAQQA 900
901 EGENSSVRLELLSIDTERRHLRERVDLLEKEIQEHINAHHAYESQISSMA 950
951 KAMSQLEEELRRHESEKATMLGDVSSLRELCIKLDSGKDVMTQQLNSKSL 1000
1001 ELERAVAELENVKSESELLKKQLTNERQTIKNLESLLATNRDKEFQSHLT 1050
1051 SHEKDTEIQLLKEKLNLSESKLTTQSRETSMLRTKVTQLQTDYDNLKRQM 1100
1101 SNEKYERERAIQEMRRLGLPTSPLSSTLKSPVQTPDHINA 1140
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.