| Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q801E2 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.98 (see score help below)
1 MDPFTEKLLERTRARRENLQKKMADRPTAGTRTAALNKRPREPLLEANHQ 50
51 PPAPAEEAKPSSKPSPSKRRCSDNASTPDAGAENKQPKTPELPKTELSAV 100
101 ASHQQLRATNQTPQVSLLSSDKELTASDVKDASSVKTRMQKLADQRRYWD 150
151 NNVSPSSSPPAHVPPKDIIVSPPKPQIPDVGNDTPVGRRGRFANLAATIG 200
201 SWEDDLSHPFVKPNNKQEKPGTACLSKESTTSSASASMNSHSVKQDTTSC 250
251 SQRPKDTTVNKAVCSGQLKNILPASKPASSVASTEVSGKSKPLAIKSPAV 300
301 VTSKPNENVLPASSSLKPVSANSSPQKTERPASRIYSYQSASARNELNNN 350
351 TPVQTQQKDKVATSGGVGIKSFLERFGEKCQEHSPAPLNQGHRTAVLTPN 400
401 TKSIQERLLKQNDISSTASLAQQQKKEREKELAALRGRYDRRNVWTKQED 450
451 EQQGTFPETSSNLPTSDVASCSETKRAEASGITSEKSVSGHFHPNMAEQV 500
501 SSPEKIPTPVQSQLPLESPRLVNEGNTGNVACEVEMSVDGSIEEINSSGI 550
551 ITNIFSDVLEQHDEEGEEVDECLVEQVETDTDDEEREDEEEDALNISSMS 600
601 LLAPLAETVGIESPKALLSPSNKVAAGNGESCDRKRSGRFQKSHVLRAES 650
651 NDGIGSSEENQNLLYSIDAYRSQRFKETDRPPIMQTIVRKEDVSSRLQDK 700
701 KTASPLSVNIKQKMKTLSNEVNLQQTVIHQASQALNCCIDEDHGKGSETE 750
751 AEAERLLIVATEKRAALIAELNKIKNEGPQSQKKNVSNESAPSRGCISVS 800
801 EMFLPLKADFVCNATQRMDSANYYFFLMIRAGAENIVASPLTSITSTMKG 850
851 DALAFPTTFSLEDVSNDFEICVEVYSLVQKKEGHAPDKKKKTMKSKAITP 900
901 KRLLTSITKSNMHTPALASPGGPNAVRTSNFVLVGSHKLTLSSIGSNKFP 950
951 LDKVPFLSPLEGHIYLKIKCHVNSSVEDKGFLTMFEDVSGFGAWHRRWCV 1000
1001 LSGYCISYWTYPDDEKRKKPIGRINLANCTSRKIEPANREFCARPNTFEL 1050
1051 ITVRPQREGDRETLVSQCRDTLCVTKNWLSADTKEERNLWMQKLNQFLVD 1100
1101 LRMWQPNACYRPASKP 1116
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.