| Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q8CCH7 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.98 (see score help below)
1 MSRRKQSKPRQIKRPLEDAIDDEEEECPVEEAEVISKGDFPLEGSFPAGF 50
51 EPENLSCEDVEFFCNKGDDEGIQEPAESDGDSHSDKPGQPGVETDDWDGP 100
101 GELEVFQRDGERKIQSRQQLPVGTTWGPFAGKMDLNNNSLKTKAQVPMVL 150
151 TAGPKWLLDVTWQGVEDSKNNCIVYSKGGQLWCTTTKAISEGEELVAFVV 200
201 DFDSRLQAASHMTLTEGMYPARLLDSIQLLPQQAAMASILPTAIVNKDIF 250
251 PCKSCGIWYRSERNLQAHLMYYCSGRQREAAPVSEENEDNSHQVSSLCPF 300
301 PQCTKSFSNARALEMHLNSHSGVKMEEFLPPGASLKCTVCSYTADSVINF 350
351 HQHLFSHLTQAAFRCNHCHFGFQTQRELLQHQELHVPSGKLPRESDMEHS 400
401 PSGTEDSLQPATDLLARSDLSQSQKAMPTKDASSDTELDKCEKKTQLFLT 450
451 NQRPEIQPAANKQNFSYTKIKSEPSSPRLASSPVQPNIGPSFPVGPFLSQ 500
501 FAFPQDITMVPQASEILAKMSELVHRRLRHGSSSYPPVIYSPLMPKGATC 550
551 FECNITFNNLDNYLVHKKHYCSSRWQQMAKSPEFPSVSEKMPEAVSPNTG 600
601 QTSINLLNPAAHSSDPENPLLQTSCINSSTVLDLIGPNGKGHEKDFSTQV 650
651 KKLPTSNSSDDKINGKPVDVKNPSGPLVDGESDPNKTTCEACNITFSRHE 700
701 TYMVHKQYYCATRHDPPLKRSASNKVPAMQRTMRTRKRRKMYEMCLPEQE 750
751 QRPPLVQQRFLDVANLSNPCSSTQEPTEGLGECYHPRCDIFPGIVSKHLE 800
801 TSLAMNKCVPVPKCDTTHSNVSCLEMDVPIDLSKKCLSQSERTTASPKRL 850
851 LDYHECTVCKISFNKVENYLAHKQNFCPVTAHQRNDLGQLDGKVFPNPES 900
901 ERSSPEVSFERNMIKCEKNGNPKQPSPNGNLFSSHLATLQGLKVFSEAAQ 950
951 LIATKEENKHLFLPQCLYPGAIKKTKGADQLSPYYGIKPSDYIASSLVIH 1000
1001 NTDVEQSTNTENESPKGQASSNGCAVPKKDSLPLLPKNRGMVIVNGGLKQ 1050
1051 DERPTANPQQENISQNTQHEDGHKSPSWISENPLAANENVSPGIPCAEEQ 1100
1101 LSSIAKGVNGASQAPSSGKYCRLCDIQFNNLSNFITHKKFYCSSHAAEHV 1150
1151 K 1151
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.