 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q8N0W3 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.15 (see score help below)
1 MEQPKGVDWTVIILTCQYKDSVQVFQRELEVRQKREQIPAGTLLLAVEDP 50
51 EKRVGSGGATLNALLVAAEHLSARAGFTVVTSDVLHSAWILILHMGRDFP 100
101 FDDCGRAFTCLPVENPEAPVEALVCNLDCLLDIMTYRLGPGSPPGVWVCS 150
151 TDMLLSVPANPGISWDSFRGARVIALPGSPAYAQNHGVYLTDPQGLVLDI 200
201 YYQGTEAEIQRCVRPDGRVPLVSGVVFFSVETAERLLATHVSPPLDACTY 250
251 LGLDSGARPVQLSLFFDILHCMAENVTREDFLVGRPPELGQGDADVAGYL 300
301 QSARAQLWRELRDQPLTMAYVSSGSYSYMTSSASEFLLSLTLPGAPGAQI 350
351 VHSQVEEQQLLAAGSSVVSCLLEGPVQLGPGSVLQHCHLQGPIHIGAGCL 400
401 VTGLDTAHSKALHGRELRDLVLQGHHTRLHGSPGHAFTLVGRLDSWERQG 450
451 AGTYLNVPWSEFFKRTGVRAWDLWDPETLPAEYCLPSARLFPVLHPSREL 500
501 GPQDLLWMLDHQEDGGEALRAWRASWRLSWEQLQPCLDRAATLASRRDLF 550
551 FRQALHKARHVLEARQDLSLRPLIWAAVREGCPGPLLATLDQVAAGAGDP 600
601 GVAARALACVADVLGCMAEGRGGLRSGPAANPEWMRPFSYLECGDLAAGV 650
651 EALAQERDKWLSRPALLVRAARHYEGAGQILIRQAVMSAQHFVSTEQVEL 700
701 PGPGQWVVAECPARVDFSGGWSDTPPLAYELGGAVLGLAVRVDGRRPIGA 750
751 RARRIPEPELWLAVGPRQDEMTVKIVCRCLADLRDYCQPHAPGALLKAAF 800
801 ICAGIVHVHSELQLSEQLLRTFGGGFELHTWSELPHGSGLGTSSILAGTA 850
851 LAALQRAAGRVVGTEALIHAVLHLEQVLTTGGGWQDQVGGLMPGIKVGRS 900
901 RAQLPLKVEVEEVTVPEGFVQKLNDHLLLVYTGKTRLARNLLQDVLRSWY 950
951 ARLPAVVQNAHSLVRQTEECAEGFRQGSLPLLGQCLTSYWEQKKLMAPGC 1000
1001 EPLTVRRMMDVLAPHVHGQSLAGAGGGGFLYLLTKEPQQKEALEAVLAKT 1050
1051 EGLGNYSIHLVEVDTQGLSLKLLGTEASTCCPFP 1084
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.