 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q8TCU5 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.71 (see score help below)
1 MRRLSLWWLLSRVCLLLPPPCALVLAGVPSSSSHPQPCQILKRIGHAVRV 50
51 GAVHLQPWTTAPRAASRAPDDSRAGAQRDEPEPGTRRSPAPSPGARWLGS 100
101 TLHGRGPPGSRKPGEGARAEALWPRDALLFAVDNLNRVEGLLPYNLSLEV 150
151 VMAIEAGLGDLPLLPFSSPSSPWSSDPFSFLQSVCHTVVVQGVSALLAFP 200
201 QSQGEMMELDLVSLVLHIPVISIVRHEFPRESQNPLHLQLSLENSLSSDA 250
251 DVTVSILTMNNWYNFSLLLCQEDWNITDFLLLTQNNSKFHLGSIINITAN 300
301 LPSTQDLLSFLQIQLESIKNSTPTVVMFGCDMESIRRIFEITTQFGVMPP 350
351 ELRWVLGDSQNVEELRTEGLPLGLIAHGKTTQSVFEHYVQDAMELVARAV 400
401 ATATMIQPELALIPSTMNCMEVETTNLTSGQYLSRFLANTTFRGLSGSIR 450
451 VKGSTIVSSENNFFIWNLQHDPMGKPMWTRLGSWQGGKIVMDYGIWPEQA 500
501 QRHKTHFQHPSKLHLRVVTLIEHPFVFTREVDDEGLCPAGQLCLDPMTND 550
551 SSTLDSLFSSLHSSNDTVPIKFKKCCYGYCIDLLEKIAEDMNFDFDLYIV 600
601 GDGKYGAWKNGHWTGLVGDLLRGTAHMAVTSFSINTARSQVIDFTSPFFS 650
651 TSLGILVRTRDTAAPIGAFMWPLHWTMWLGIFVALHITAVFLTLYEWKSP 700
701 FGLTPKGRNRSKVFSFSSALNICYALLFGRTVAIKPPKCWTGRFLMNLWA 750
751 IFCMFCLSTYTANLAAVMVGEKIYEELSGIHDPKLHHPSQGFRFGTVRES 800
801 SAEDYVRQSFPEMHEYMRRYNVPATPDGVEYLKNDPEKLDAFIMDKALLD 850
851 YEVSIDADCKLLTVGKPFAIEGYGIGLPPNSPLTANISELISQYKSHGFM 900
901 DMLHDKWYRVVPCGKRSFAVTETLQMGIKHFSGLFVLLCIGFGLSILTTI 950
951 GEHIVYRLLLPRIKNKSKLQYWLHTSQRLHRAINTSFIEEKQQHFKTKRV 1000
1001 EKRSNVGPRQLTVWNTSNLSHDNRRKYIFSDEEGQNQLGIRIHQDIPLPP 1050
1051 RRRELPALRTTNGKADSLNVSRNSVMQELSELEKQIQVIRQELQLAVSRK 1100
1101 TELEEYQRTSRTCES 1115
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.