 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q8TEW8 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.84 (see score help below)
1 MKVTVCFGRTGIVVPCKEGQLRVGELTQQALQRYLKTREKGPGYWVKIHH 50
51 LEYTDGGILDPDDVLADVVEDKDKLIAVFEEQEPLHKIESPSGNPADRQS 100
101 PDAFETEVAAQLAAFKPIGGEIEVTPSALKLGTPLLVRRSSDPVPGPPAD 150
151 TQPSASHPGGQSLKLVVPDSTQNLEDREVLNGVQTELLTSPRTKDTLSDM 200
201 TRTVEISGEGGPLGIHVVPFFSSLSGRILGLFIRGIEDNSRSKREGLFHE 250
251 NECIVKINNVDLVDKTFAQAQDVFRQAMKSPSVLLHVLPPQNREQYEKSV 300
301 IGSLNIFGNNDGVLKTKVPPPVHGKSGLKTANLTGTDSPETDASASLQQN 350
351 KSPRVPRLGGKPSSPSLSPLMGFGSNKNAKKIKIDLKKGPEGLGFTVVTR 400
401 DSSIHGPGPIFVKNILPKGAAIKDGRLQSGDRILEVNGRDVTGRTQEELV 450
451 AMLRSTKQGETASLVIARQEGHFLPRELKGEPDCCALSLETSEQLTFEIP 500
501 LNDSGSAGLGVSLKGNKSRETGTDLGIFIKSIIHGGAAFKDGRLRMNDQL 550
551 IAVNGESLLGKSNHEAMETLRRSMSMEGNIRGMIQLVILRRPERPMEDPA 600
601 ECGAFSKPCFENCQNAVTTSRRNDNSILHPLGTCSPQDKQKGLLLPNDGW 650
651 AESEVPPSPTPHSALGLGLEDYSHSSGVDSAVYFPDQHINFRSVTPARQP 700
701 ESINLKASKSMDLVPDESKVHSLAGQKSESPSKDFGPTLGLKKSSSLESL 750
751 QTAVAEVRKNDLPFHRPRPHMVRGRGCNESFRAAIDKSYDGPEEIEADGL 800
801 SDKSSHSGQGALNCESAPQGNSELEDMENKARKVKKTKEKEKKKEKGKLK 850
851 VKEKKRKEENEDPERKIKKKGFGAMLRFGKKKEDKGGKAEQKGTLKHGGL 900
901 REEELEKMKEERERIGAKHQELREKQARGLLDYATGAIGSVYDMDDDEMD 950
951 PNYARVNHFREPCTSANVFRSPSPPRAGPFGYPRDGHPLSPERDHLEGLY 1000
1001 AKVNKPYHPLVPADSGRPTGGSTDRIQKLRKEYYQARREGFPLYEDDEGR 1050
1051 ARPSEYDLLWVPGRGPDGNAHNLRFEGMERQYASLPRGGPADPVDYLPAA 1100
1101 PRGLYKERELPYYPGAHPMHPPKGSYPRPTELRVADLRYPQHYPPPPAPQ 1150
1151 HKGPFRQDVPPSPPQHQRMPAYQETGRPGPRGGSPDQYPYRTQDSRQKNP 1200
1201 MTAAV 1205
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.