 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q8VI51 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.60 (see score help below)
1 MEAAGTERPAGWPGAPLARTGLLLLSTWVLAGAEITWGATGGPGRLVSPA 50
51 SRPPVLPPLLPRAAENRWPEELASARRAAAPRRRSRLEPLSQASRGEIRT 100
101 EAAGMSPEGARWVPGIPSPSQAGSARRTRRAQPPSPLERGDSWATALADG 150
151 AKGSRPHTKGSREEVRATRTGGASTEELRLPSTSFALTGDSAHNQAMVHW 200
201 SGHNSSVILILTKLYDFNLGSVTESSLWRSVDYGATYEKLNDKVGLKTVL 250
251 SYLYVNPTNKRKIMLLSDPEMESSVLISSDEGATYQKYRLTFYIQSLLFH 300
301 PKQEDWVLAYSLDQKLYSSMDFGRRWQLMHERITPNRFYWSVSGLDKEAD 350
351 LVHMEVRTADGYAHYLTCRIQECAETTRSGPFARSIDISSLVVQDEYIFI 400
401 QVTIGGRASYYVSYRREAFAQIKLPKYSLPKDMHIISTDENQVFAAVQEW 450
451 NQNDTYNLYISDTRGIYFTLAMENIKSSRGLMGNIIIELYEVAGIKGIFL 500
501 ANKKVDDQVKTYITYNKGRDWRLLQAPDVDLRGSPVHCLLPFCSLHLHLQ 550
551 LSENPYSSGRISSKDTAPGLVVATGNIGSELSYTDIGVFISSDGGNTWRQ 600
601 IFDEEYNVWFLDWGGALVAMKHTPLPVRHLWVSFDEGHSWDKYGFTLLPL 650
651 FVDGALVEAGVETHIMTVFGHFSLRSEWQLVKVDYKSIFSRRCTKEDFET 700
701 WHLLNQGEPCVMGERKIFKKRKPGAQCALGREYSGSVVSEPCVCADWDFE 750
751 CDYGYERHGESQCVPAFWYNPASPSKDCSLGQSYLNSTGYRRIVSNNCTD 800
801 GLRDKYSAKTQLCPGKAPRGLHVVTTDGRLVAEQGHNATFIILMEEGDLQ 850
851 RTNIQLDFGDGVAVSYANFSPIEDGIRHVYKSAGIFQVTAYAENNLGSDT 900
901 AFLFLHVVCPVEHVHLRVPFVAIRNKDVNISAVVWPSQLGTLTYFWWFGN 950
951 STKPLITLDSSISFTFLAEGTNTITVQVAAGNALIQDTKEIAVHEYFQSQ 1000
1001 LLSFSPNLDYHNPDIPEWRQDIGNVIKRALIKVTSVPEDQILVAVFPGLP 1050
1051 TSAELFILPPKNLTERRKGHEGDLEQIVETLFNALNQNLVQFELKPGVQV 1100
1101 IVYVTQLTLAPLVDSSAGHSSSAMLMLLSVVFVGLAVFLIYKFKRKIPWI 1150
1151 NIYAQVQHDKEQEMIGSVSQSENAPKITLSDFTEPEELLDKELDTRVIGS 1200
1201 IATIASSESTKEIPNCTSV 1219
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.