| Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q8WW38 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.99 (see score help below)
1 MSRRKQSKPRQIKRPLEDAIEDEEEECPSEETDIISKGDFPLEESFSTEF 50
51 GPENLSCEEVEYFCNKGDDEGIQETAESDGDTQSEKPGQPGVETDDWDGP 100
101 GELEVFQKDGERKIQSRQQLPVGTTWGPFPGKMDLNNNSLKTKAQVPMVL 150
151 TAGPKWLLDVTWQGVEDNKNNCIVYSKGGQLWCTTTKAISEGEELIAFVV 200
201 DFDSRLQAASQMTLTEGMYPARLLDSIQLLPQQAAMASILPTAIVNKDIF 250
251 PCKSCGIWYRSERNLQAHLMYYCSGRQREAAPVSEENEDSAHQISSLCPF 300
301 PQCTKSFSNARALEMHLNSHSGVKMEEFLPPGASLKCTVCSYTADSVINF 350
351 HQHLFSHLTQAAFRCNHCHFGFQTQRELLQHQELHVPSGKLPRESDMEHS 400
401 PSATEDSLQPATDLLTRSELPQSQKAMQTKDASSDTELDKCEKKTQLFLT 450
451 NQRPEIQPTTNKQSFSYTKIKSEPSSPRLASSPVQPNIGPSFPVGPFLSQ 500
501 FSFPQDITMVPQASEILAKMSELVHRRLRHGSSSYPPVIYSPLMPKGATC 550
551 FECNITFNNLDNYLVHKKHYCSSRWQQMAKSPEFPSVSEKMPEALSPNTG 600
601 QTSINLLNPAAHSADPENPLLQTSCINSSTVLDLIGPNGKGHDKDFSTQT 650
651 KKLSTSSNNDDKINGKPVDVKNPSVPLVDGESDPNKTTCEACNITFSRHE 700
701 TYMVHKQYYCATRHDPPLKRSASNKVPAMQRTMRTRKRRKMYEMCLPEQE 750
751 QRPPLVQQRFLDVANLNNPCTSTQEPTEGLGECYHPRCDIFPGIVSKHLE 800
801 TSLTINKCVPVSKCDTTHSSVSCLEMDVPIDLSKKCLSQSERTTTSPKRL 850
851 LDYHECTVCKISFNKVENYLAHKQNFCPVTAHQRNDLGQLDGKVFPNPES 900
901 ERNSPDVSYERSIIKCEKNGNLKQPSPNGNLFSSHLATLQGLKVFSEAAQ 950
951 LIATKEENRHLFLPQCLYPGAIKKAKGADQLSPYYGIKPSDYISGSLVIH 1000
1001 NTDIEQSRNAENESPKGQASSNGCAALKKDSLPLLPKNRGMVIVNGGLKQ 1050
1051 DERPAANPQQENISQNPQHEDDHKSPSWISENPLAANENVSPGIPSAEEQ 1100
1101 LSSIAKGVNGSSQAPTSGKYCRLCDIQFNNLSNFITHKKFYCSSHAAEHV 1150
1151 K 1151
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.