 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q96R06 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.71 (see score help below)
1 MWRVKKLSLSLSPSPQTGKPSMRTPLRELTLQPGALTNSGKRSPACSSLT 50
51 PSLCKLGLQEGSNNSSPVDFVNNKRTDLSSEHFSHSSKWLETCQHESDEQ 100
101 PLDPIPQISSTPKTSEEAVDPLGNYMVKTIVLVPSPLGQQQDMIFEARLD 150
151 TMAETNSISLNGPLRTDDLVREEVAPCMGDRFSEVAAVSEKPIFQESPSH 200
201 LLEESPPNPCSEQLHCSKESLSSRTEAVREDLVPSESNAFLPSSVLWLSP 250
251 STALAADFRVNHVDPEEEIVEHGAMEEREMRFPTHPKESETEDQALVSSV 300
301 EDILSTCLTPNLVEMESQEAPGPAVEDVGRILGSDTESWMSPLAWLEKGV 350
351 NTSVMLENLRQSLSLPSMLRDAAIGTTPFSTCSVGTWFTPSAPQEKSTNT 400
401 SQTGLVGTKHSTSETEQLLCGRPPDLTALSRHDLEDNLLSSLVILEVLSR 450
451 QLRDWKSQLAVPHPETQDSSTQTDTSHSGITNKLQHLKESHEMGQALQQA 500
501 RNVMQSWVLISKELISLLHLSLLHLEEDKTTVSQESRRAETLVCCCFDLL 550
551 KKLRAKLQSLKAEREEARHREEMALRGKDAAEIVLEAFCAHASQRISQLE 600
601 QDLASMREFRGLLKDAQTQLVGLHAKQEELVQQTVSLTSTLQQDWRSMQL 650
651 DYTTWTALLSRSRQLTEKLTVKSQQALQERDVAIEEKQEVSRVLEQVSAQ 700
701 LEECKGQTEQLELENSRLATDLRAQLQILANMDSQLKELQSQHTHCAQDL 750
751 AMKDELLCQLTQSNEEQAAQWQKEEMALKHMQAELQQQQAVLAKEVRDLK 800
801 ETLEFADQENQVAHLELGQVECQLKTTLEVLRERSLQCENLKDTVENLTA 850
851 KLASTIADNQEQDLEKTRQYSQKLGLLTEQLQSLTLFLQTKLKEKTEQET 900
901 LLLSTACPPTQEHPLPNDRTFLGSILTAVADEEPESTPVPLLGSDKSAFT 950
951 RVASMVSLQPAETPGMEESLAEMSIMTTELQSLCSLLQESKEEAIRTLQR 1000
1001 KICELQARLQAQEEQHQEVQKAKEADIEKLNQALCLRYKNEKELQEVIQQ 1050
1051 QNEKILEQIDKSGELISLREEVTHLTRSLRRAETETKVLQEALAGQLDSN 1100
1101 CQPMATNWIQEKVWLSQEVDKLRVMFLEMKNEKEKLMIKFQSHRNILEEN 1150
1151 LRRSDKELEKLDDIVQHIYKTLLSIPEVVRGCKELQGLLEFLS 1193
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.