| Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q99PP7 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.95 (see score help below)
1 MAENKGGGEAESGGGGSGSAPVTAGAAGPTAQEAEPPLAAVLVEEEEEEG 50
51 GRAGAEGGAAGPDDGGVAAASSSSAPAASVPAASVGSAVPGGAASTPAPA 100
101 AAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPGSSSGPPLGPPASLLDTCAVCQQSLQS 150
151 RREAEPKLLPCLHSFCLRCLPEPERQLSVPIPGGSNGDVQQVGVIRCPVC 200
201 RQECRQIDLVDNYFVKDTSEAPSSSDEKSEQVCTSCEDNASAVGFCVECG 250
251 EWLCKTCIEAHQRVKFTKDHLIRKKEDVSESVGTSGQRPVFCPVHKQEQL 300
301 KLFCETCDRLTCRDCQLLEHKEHRYQFLEEAFQNQKGAIENLLAKLLEKK 350
351 NYVHFAATQVQNRIKEVNETNKRVEQEIKVAIFTLINEINKKGKSLLQQL 400
401 ENVTKERQMKLLQQQNDITGLSRQVKHVMNFTNWAIASGSSTALLYSKRL 450
451 ITFQLRHILKARCDPVPAANGAIRFHCDPTFWAKNVVNLGNLVIESKPAP 500
501 GYTPNVVVGQVPPGTNHISKTPGQINLAQLRLQHMQQQVYAQKHQQLQQM 550
551 RLQQPPAPIPTTTATTQQHPRQAAPQMLQQQPPRLISVQTMQRGNMNCGA 600
601 FQAHQMRLAQNAARIPGIPRHSAPQYSMMQPHLQRQHSNPGHAGPFPVVS 650
651 AHNPINPTSPTTATMANANRGPTSPSVTAIELIPSVTNPENLPSLPDIPP 700
701 IQLEDAGSSSLDNLLSRYISGSHLPPQPTSTMNPSPGPSALSPGSSGLSN 750
751 SHTPVRPPSTSSTGSRGSCGSSGRTAEKSAHSFKSDQVKVKQEPGTEEEI 800
801 CSFSGAVKQEKTEDGRRSACMLSSPESSLTPPLSTNLHLESELDTLTGLE 850
851 NHVKTEPTDISESCKQSGLSNLVNGKSPIRNLMHRSARIGGDGNSKDDDP 900
901 NEDWCAVCQNGGDLLCCEKCPKVFHLTCHVPTLLSFPSGDWICTFCRDIG 950
951 KPEVEYDCDNMQHSKKGKTAQGLSPVDQRKCERLLLYLYCHELSIEFQEP 1000
1001 VPVSIPNYYKIIKKPMDLSTVKKKLQKKHSQHYQIPDDFVADVRLIFKNC 1050
1051 ERFNEMMKVVQVYADTQEINLKGDSEVAKAGKAVALYFEDKLSEIYSDRT 1100
1101 FTPLPEFEQDEDDGEVTEDSDEDFIQPRRKRLKSDERPVHIK 1142
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.