 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9C7F8 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.29 (see score help below)
1 MDNTERSSNGNIQAETEAKEEKKNIKKESVSLMGLFSAADKLDYFLMLLG 50
51 GLGACIHGATLPLFFVFFGKMLDSLGNLSTDPKAISSRVSQNALYLVYLG 100
101 LVNFVSAWIGVSCWMQTGERQTARLRINYLKSILAKDITFFDTEARDSNL 150
151 IFHISSDAILVQDAIGDKTDHVLRYLSQFIAGFVIGFLSVWQLTLLTLGV 200
201 VPLIAIAGGGYAIVMSTISEKSETAYADAGKVAEEVMSQVRTVYAFVGEE 250
251 KAVKSYSNSLKKALKLGKRSGLAKGLGVGLTYSLLFCAWALLLWYASLLV 300
301 RHGKTNGAKAFTTILNVIFSGFALGQAAPSLSAIAKGRVAAANIFRMIGN 350
351 NNSESSQRLDEGTTLQNVAGRIEFQKVSFAYPSRPNMVFENLSFTIRSGK 400
401 TFAFVGPSGSGKSTIISMVQRFYEPNSGEILLDGNDIKSLKLKWFREQLG 450
451 LVSQEPALFATTIASNILLGKENANMDQIIEAAKAANADSFIKSLPNGYN 500
501 TQVGEGGTQLSGGQKQRIAIARAVLRNPKILLLDEATSALDAESEKIVQQ 550
551 ALDNVMEKRTTIVVAHRLSTIRNVDKIVVLRDGQVRETGSHSELMLRGGD 600
601 YATLVNCQETEPQENSRSIMSETCKSQAGSSSSRRVSSSRRTSSFRVDQE 650
651 KTKNDDSKKDFSSSSMIWELIKLNSPEWPYALLGSIGAVLAGAQTPLFSM 700
701 GIAYVLTAFYSPFPNVIKRDVEKVAIIFAGAGIVTAPIYLLQHYFYTLMG 750
751 ERLTSRVRLSLFSAILSNEIGWFDLDENNTGSLTSILAADATLVRSALAD 800
801 RLSTIVQNLSLTVTALALAFFYSWRVAAVVTACFPLLIAASLTEQLFLKG 850
851 FGGDYTRAYSRATSVAREAIANIRTVAAYGAEKQISEQFTCELSKPTKNA 900
901 FVRGHISGFGYGLSQFLAFCSYALGLWYVSVLINHKETNFGDSIKSFMVL 950
951 IVTAFSVSETLALTPDIVKGTQALGSVFRVLHRETKISPDQPNSRMVSQV 1000
1001 KGDIEFRNVSFVYPTRPEIDIFKNLNLRVSAGKSLAVVGPSGSGKSTVIG 1050
1051 LIMRFYDPSNGNLCIDGQDIKTLNLRSLRKKLALVQQEPALFSTTIYENI 1100
1101 KYGNENASEAEIMEAAKAANAHEFIIKMEEGYKTHAGDKGVQLSGGQKQR 1150
1151 VAIARAVLKDPSVLLLDEATSALDTSSEKLVQEALDKLMKGRTTVLVAHR 1200
1201 LSTIRKADTVAVLHKGRVVEKGSHRELVSIPNGFYKQLTSLQEVL 1245
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.