 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9CSB4 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.77 (see score help below)
1 MKVTVCFGRTGIVVPCKDGQLRVRELTQQALQRYLKTRDQDPGYWVKIHH 50
51 LEYTDGGILDPDDVLADVVEDKDKLIAVFDEQEPLQKTESPGGNPADRQS 100
101 PDAFETEVAAQLAAFKPVGGEIVVTPSALKLGTPLLVRRSSDPAPGPHAD 150
151 AQPSTASLSGQSLKPVVLDSTQNVENKEAMNGEQAGLLSLHRPKDELSDM 200
201 TRAVEISGEGDPLGIHVVPFFSSLSGRILGLFIRGIEENSRCKQEGLFQE 250
251 NECIVKINNVELLDKTFAQAQDVFRQAMKSPSVILHVLLPQNREQYEKSV 300
301 IGPLNIFGNNDGASRTKAAPPARGKPGLKAVHLTRASSPEGEEPASPQQS 350
351 KSPRVPRLGRKPSSPSLSPLMGFGSKKNAKKIKIDLKKGPEGLGFTVVTR 400
401 DSSIHGPGPIFVKNILPKGAAVKDGRLQSGDRILEVNGRDVTGRTQEELV 450
451 AMLRSTKQGETVSLVIARQEGSFLPRELKGEPDCYALSLESSEQLTLEIP 500
501 LNDSGSAGLGVSLKGNKSRETGTDLGIFIKSIIHGGAAFKDGRLRMNDQL 550
551 IAVNGETLLGKSNHEAMETLRRSMSMEGNIRGMIQLVILRRPERPLEELS 600
601 ECGALSRPGFENCQEALSTSRRNDSSILYPFGTYSPQDKRKDLLLPSDGW 650
651 AENEVPPSPPPHPALEWGLEDFSHSSGVDSTGYFPDQHVNFRTVTPVRQP 700
701 ELINLKASKSMDLVPDEGKVQSLADRRSDSPGKDFGPTLGLKKSSSLESL 750
751 QTAVAEVRKNDLPFHRPRPHMVRGRGCNESFRAAIDKSYDGPEEADADGL 800
801 SDKSSRSGHTALNCESAPQGNPELDNVENKAKNIKKTKEKEKKKGKGKLK 850
851 VKEKKLKEEHEDAERKMKRKGFGAMLRFGKKKDDKVGKAEQKGAQKSGHP 900
901 EEEELERMKEERERIGAKHQELREKQARGLVDYATAVTGPVHDMDDDEMD 950
951 PNYARVNHFREPCASANVFRSPSPLRAGPLAYPRDGRPLSPDHLEGLYAK 1000
1001 VNKPYHPPALADSGRPMAGTTDRIQKLRKEYYQARREGFLLYEDENTRAR 1050
1051 PSDHDLRWVSGKGPDGSTHNLRFEGMERQYASLPRGGSADPVDYLTASPR 1100
1101 GRYNDRELPYYPGPHPVHAPRGSYPRPPDLRATDLRYPQYYPPPPAHQHK 1150
1151 GPFRQDVPPSPPQHQRVPVYQEMGRAGPRGSSPDQYPYRNQDPRQKNPMT 1200
1201 AAV 1203
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.