| Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9DE13 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.98 (see score help below)
1 MESGERLTSSSVSSTAAASSPVSSTPSVASAVSKSGLTTGAASLSSTINT 50
51 GEWWRTADSHSRSGAAFFPPLLGPPLLGISPLFAPPAQNHDSTPFHPRTT 100
101 GKNNRGSLEKGINGSLNGNSTTAASAISTSVLSTSIATSAGQVKVVTSGA 150
151 GGRKYNQEQNKVQLLDTRADKIKDKKPRKKAVESSSNSDSDSGSSSDTSS 200
201 EGISSSDSDDLEEDEEEEEDQSAEESEDDESDSENEAHHENKNKVLMHSG 250
251 VKDMKTDGQKAHEKSQEKRTHQQIPLVSDSQTHSSFQSQQKQPQVLSQQL 300
301 PFIFQSSQAKEESVNKHTSVIQSTGLVPNVKPLSLVHQTKKEAYLKIIVP 350
351 PPDLLKAGNKNTSEESIPLISDVRSKREQYKQTFPAAQLKKQESSKNLKK 400
401 VIASLSSSKPTSCSPAHQKLTSLENNHSNPFLTNALLGNHQPNGVIQSVI 450
451 QEVPLALTTKQKSQTKINESVAIASSTPFSLPVNLSACGKKTTGNRTLVV 500
501 PSTSPVLPGSGKDKPVSNNAVNAVKTQHCLPSAKLVVEQFRGVDSDAPSS 550
551 KESDDSNDDDDDDEDEDEDDEDDDSDDSQSESDSNSESDTDGSEDEDDED 600
601 DKDQDESDTDTEGEKTPLKLKKTGSSIKSSSIGPVAHSTPLNLQVAKTPS 650
651 SAPSALCPETQPAVFLGTTPSTLTPSSHCGISKRRRVTDERELRVPLEYG 700
701 WQRETRIRNFGGRLQGEVAYFAPCGKKLRQYPEVVKGVQWCLLKEEEVVP 750
751 CIRAMEGRRGRPPNPDRQHSREESRMRRRKGRPPNVGSTEFLDSTDAKLL 800
801 RKLQAQEIARQAAQIKLLRKLQKQEQARAAKEAKKQQAIMAAEEKRKQKE 850
851 QIKIMKQQEKIKRIQQIRMEKELRAQQILEAKKKKKEEAANAKLLEAEKR 900
901 IKEKEMRRQQAVLLKHQELERHRLDMERERRRQHMMLMKAMEARKKAEEK 950
951 ERLKQEKRDEKRLNKERKLEQRRLELEMAKELKKPNEDMCLADQKALPEL 1000
1001 PRIPGLVLSGSTFSDCLMIVQFLRNFGKVLGFDVNTDVPSLSTLQEGLLN 1050
1051 IGDSRGEVQDLLVKLVTAAVCDPGLVTGYKAKTILGEHLLNVGINRDNVS 1100
1101 EILQIFMEAHCGQTELTESLKTKAFQAHTPAQKAAVLAFLVNELACSKSV 1150
1151 VSEIDKNIDYMSNLRRDKWMVEGKLRNLRIIHAKKTGKRDATGGGEVGEE 1200
1201 PHSLETPTPGRKRRRKGGDSDYDDDDDDDSDDQADEDDEDEEDKEDKKGK 1250
1251 KAEVCEDEDDGDQTVSVEELEKQIEKLTKQQSQYRKKLFEASHCLRSMMF 1300
1301 GQDRYRRRYWILPQCGGIFVEGMESGEGLEEIAKEKEKLKKVESIHIKEE 1350
1351 VFEISEEKISCLNTTRCEQKEDLKEKDNTNLFLQKPGSFSKLSKLLEVAK 1400
1401 MPPECDVMPQKPNGGAANGCTPSYQNTSQNSLCSLQPSVSQSSSEKSDSS 1450
1451 NLFSPTASGTGKFYSSPLIPSDQLLKTLTEKNRQWFSLLPRVPCDDMSVT 1500
1501 HVDTPATTSLTPQSHPPSKSPSPVPSPLLGSTSAQSPMGLSPFAMPPLQQ 1550
1551 MKPGLPVMGLQFCGWPTGVLTSNVQFSSPLPTLGSGLGLSEGNGNSFLTS 1600
1601 SVPTSKSESPALQTEKVAFATCTAVEVAKPVDHPNPKPIPEEMQYGWWRI 1650
1651 TDPEDLKSLHKVLHLRGIREKALQKQIQKHMDYITLACIKNKDVAIIDIN 1700
1701 ENEDNQVTRDVVENWSVEEQAMEVDLAILQQVEDLERRVASASLQVKGWL 1750
1751 CPEPASEREDLVYHEHKSIIRLHKKHDGDSAGGGEGSTSSLERKNDNPLD 1800
1801 IAVTRLADLERNIERRYLKSPLSTTIQIKLDNVGTVTVPAPAPSISGDGD 1850
1851 GTEEDIAPGLRVWRKALSEARSAAQVALCIQQLQKSIAWEKSIMKVYCQI 1900
1901 CRKGDNEELLLLCDGCDKGCHTYCHRPKITTIPDGDWFCPACIAKASGQT 1950
1951 LKLKKLQIKGKKSNEQKRGRKLPGDTEDEDSATTSTSLKRGKTEPKKRKM 2000
2001 DESVSVSQGKQENFTAIKKPKRDDSKDLAICSMILSELETHEDAWPFLLP 2050
2051 VNLKLVPGYKKVIKKPMDFSTIRDKLTSGQYPNVEAFSLDVRLVFDNCET 2100
2101 FNEDDSDIGRAGHNMRKYFEKKWTEIFKLS 2130
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.