 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9GQN0 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.60 (see score help below)
1 MDIQQLEVLCKQLYEATDIRIRSEAEKALVTFVSSQDALPKCQLLLQRAD 50
51 SSYAQLLAASTLTKLIQGLSLQERIDIRSYALNYLATVPNLQHFVVQALV 100
101 SLLAKLTKYGWFDSYKEEMVFQNLLEDVKKFLQGSVEHCTIGVQILSQLV 150
151 CEMNSVVEMDVQVSFSKMRKIATSFRDQQLLETFLLSCSLLVSARDNSKN 200
201 ISFMDESQQALISHVLRLTKNCLSFDFIGSSTDESADDMNNVQIPTAWRP 250
251 AFLDSNTLKLFFDLYQILPNGLASYSISCLVQITSVRRSLFNNSERTKFL 300
301 THLVEGVKDILTTLHGLSDPDNYHEFCRLLARLKSNYQLGELIAVPCYPE 350
351 AIQLIAKFTVESLHLWLFAPNSVHYLLTLWQRMVASVPYVKSPDPHLLGT 400
401 YTPEVIKAYIESRLDAVPVIIRDNLDDPLDDFCMVQQQLEQLSVIERCEY 450
451 NKTCNLLVQHFDQKAREYENLLQTPNANSIDITIHELQLTWLVYIIGSAI 500
501 VGRLTVATSDEHDTMDAELVIRVLQLMTLTDARLPQAGCEKLELAILSFL 550
551 DQVRKMHSSEQAQKANLNKRLSEVFGLTDEQMLLSFINRKIITNLKFWGR 600
601 SESIITKTLMLLSELSVHFNSVRKLARLEEVQFMLTHHTSEHFPFLGTNS 650
651 SLSEMRCRTMFYTSLGRLLMFDLGEDEERFYNFLEPLTNQFESLGSVMMD 700
701 NNIFSNEEAKKVIIGLARDLRGLALPLNARIQYTMLFEWLYYADYLPILL 750
751 RAMDLWAHDPAVTTPILKLFAELVHCRTQRLAGNVSSPMGILLFREASKL 800
801 ICIYGNRILHQEVPRERLYPMRLKGIAICFLILKNSLGGNYVNCGVFKLY 850
851 GDDTLDSVLNIIAKLILTIEQRDLIEYPKLSTAYYNLLNCLSQDHVSYLA 900
901 ALEPAAFVYILKSLTKGLAALDSATYISCCTILDSIVSYIFKQLQMKVST 950
951 FPNKKLRSLNQENVQFLKVVEMNSELLQSMMSSLLNNVLQEDCRNQWSMS 1000
1001 RPLLVLILLYEDYYRSLKDRIICAQPIEKQQTMAQWFDDLMVGIERNVSS 1050
1051 KNKEKFTQNMSTFRRDVVNLPKSTAAFSCDRPMCDGGFEPSEPESSPH 1098
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.