 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9HCJ5 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.60 (see score help below)
1 MAERGQQPPPAKRLCCRPGGGGGGGGSSGGGGGAGGGYSSACRPGPRAGG 50
51 AAAAAACGGGAALGLLPPGKTQSPESLLDIAARRVAEKWPFQRVEERFER 100
101 IPEPVQRRIVYWSFPRSEREICMYSSFNTGGGAAGGPGDDSGGGGGAGGG 150
151 GGGGSSSSPAATSAAATSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGAGAPSVGAAGAADGG 200
201 DETRLPFRRGIALLESGCVDNVLQVGFHLSGTVTEPAIQSEPETVCNVAI 250
251 SFDRCKITSVTCSCGNKDIFYCAHVVALSLYRIRKPDQVKLHLPISETLF 300
301 QMNRDQLQKFVQYLITVHHTEVLPTAQKLADEILSQNSEINQVHGAPDPT 350
351 AGASIDDENCWHLDEEQVQEQVKLFLSQGGYHGSGKQLNLLFAKVREMLK 400
401 MRDSNGARMLTLITEQFMADPRLSLWRQQGTAMTDKYRQLWDELGALWMC 450
451 IVLNPHCKLEQKASWLKQLKKWNSVDVCPWEDGNHGSELPNLTNALPQGA 500
501 NANQDSSNRPHRTVFTRAIEACDLHWQDSHLQHIISSDLYTNYCYHDDTE 550
551 NSLFDSRGWPLWHEHVPTACARVDALRSHGYPREALRLAIAIVNTLRRQQ 600
601 QKQLEMFRTQKKELPHKNITSITNLEGWVGHPLDPVGTLFSSLMEACRID 650
651 DENLSGFSDFTENMGQCKSLEYQHLPAHKFLEEGESYLTLAVEVALIGLG 700
701 QQRIMPDGLYTQEKVCRNEEQLISKLQEIELDDTLVKIFRKQAVFLLEAG 750
751 PYSGLGEIIHRESVPMHTFAKYLFTSLLPHDAELAYKIALRAMRLLVLES 800
801 TAPSGDLTRPHHIASVVPNRYPRWFTLSHIESQQCELASTMLTAAKGDVR 850
851 RLETVLESIQKNIHSSSHIFKLAQDAFKIATLMDSLPDITLLKVSLELGL 900
901 QVMRMTLSTLNWRRREMVRWLVTCATEVGVYALDSIMQTWFTLFTPTEAT 950
951 SIVATTVMSNSTIVRLHLDCHQQEKLASSARTLALQCAMKDPQNCALSAL 1000
1001 TLCEKDHIAFETAYQIVLDAATTGMSYTQLFTIARYMEHRGYPMRAYKLA 1050
1051 TLAMTHLNLSYNQDTHPAINDVLWACALSHSLGKNELAAIIPLVVKSVKC 1100
1101 ATVLSDILRRCTLTTPGMVGLHGRRNSGKLMSLDKAPLRQLLDATIGAYI 1150
1151 NTTHSRLTHISPRHYSEFIEFLSKARETFLMAHDGHIQFTQFIDNLKQIY 1200
1201 KGKKKLMMLVRERFG 1215
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.