 | Authors: Amine Heddad, Andrea Krings, Markus Brameier and Bob MacCallum, Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
NucPred
Fetching Q9HD20 from www.uniprot.org...
The NucPred score for your sequence is 0.31 (see score help below)
1 MAAAAAVGNAVPCGARPCGVRPDGQPKPGPQPRALLAAGPALIANGDELV 50
51 AAVWPYRRLALLRRLTVLPFAGLLYPAWLGAAAAGCWGWGSSWVQIPEAA 100
101 LLVLATICLAHALTVLSGHWSVHAHCALTCTPEYDPSKATFVKVVPTPNN 150
151 GSTELVALHRNEGEDGLEVLSFEFQKIKYSYDALEKKQFLPVAFPVGNAF 200
201 SYYQSNRGFQEDSEIRAAEKKFGSNKAEMVVPDFSELFKERATAPFFVFQ 250
251 VFCVGLWCLDEYWYYSVFTLSMLVAFEASLVQQQMRNMSEIRKMGNKPHM 300
301 IQVYRSRKWRPIASDEIVPGDIVSIGRSPQENLVPCDVLLLRGRCIVDEA 350
351 MLTGESVPQMKEPIEDLSPDRVLDLQADSRLHVIFGGTKVVQHIPPQKAT 400
401 TGLKPVDSGCVAYVLRTGFNTSQGKLLRTILFGVKRVTANNLETFIFILF 450
451 LLVFAIAAAAYVWIEGTKDPSRNRYKLFLECTLILTSVVPPELPIELSLA 500
501 VNTSLIALAKLYMYCTEPFRIPFAGKVEVCCFDKTGTLTSDSLVVRGVAG 550
551 LRDGKEVTPVSSIPVETHRALASCHSLMQLDDGTLVGDPLEKAMLTAVDW 600
601 TLTKDEKVFPRSIKTQGLKIHQRFHFASALKRMSVLASYEKLGSTDLCYI 650
651 AAVKGAPETLHSMFSQCPPDYHHIHTEISREGARVLALGYKELGHLTHQQ 700
701 AREVKREALECSLKFVGFIVVSCPLKADSKAVIREIQNASHRVVMITGDN 750
751 PLTACHVAQELHFIEKAHTLILQPPSEKGRQCEWRSIDGSIVLPLARGSP 800
801 KALALEYALCLTGDGLAHLQATDPQQLLRLIPHVQVFARVAPKQKEFVIT 850
851 SLKELGYVTLMCGDGTNDVGALKHADVGVALLANAPERVVERRRRPRDSP 900
901 TLSNSGIRATSRTAKQRSGLPPSEEQPTSQRDRLSQVLRDLEDESTPIVK 950
951 LGDASIAAPFTSKLSSIQCICHVIKQGRCTLVTTLQMFKILALNALILAY 1000
1001 SQSVLYLEGVKFSDFQATLQGLLLAGCFLFISRSKPLKTLSRERPLPNIF 1050
1051 NLYTILTVMLQFFVHFLSLVYLYREAQARSPEKQEQFVDLYKEFEPSLVN 1100
1101 STVYIMAMAMQMATFAINYKGPPFMESLPENKPLVWSLAVSLLAIIGLLL 1150
1151 GSSPDFNSQFGLVDIPVEFKLVIAQVLLLDFCLALLADRVLQFFLGTPKL 1200
1201 KVPS 1204
Positively and negatively influencing subsequences are coloured according to the following scale:
(non-nuclear) negative ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| positive (nuclear)
What does the NucPred score mean?
| You have to decide on a NucPred score threshold. Sequences which score greater than or equal to this threshold are predicted to spend some time in the nucleus. Higher thresholds yield fewer predicted nuclear proteins, but these predictions are more accurate (you can have higher confidence in them). The table below gives more details of the performance of NucPred estimated using the sequences it was trained on (by cross-validation). Another benchmark is available in the Bioinformatics 2007 paper. |
| NucPred score threshold | Specificity | Sensitivity |
| see above | fraction of proteins predicted to be nuclear that actually are nuclear | fraction of true nuclear proteins that are predicted (coverage) |
| 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.88 |
| 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.77 |
| 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.62 |
| 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.32 |
| 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.02 |
| Sequences which score >= 0.8 with NucPred and which
are predicted by PredictNLS to contain an NLS have been shown to be 93% correct with a coverage of 16%. (PredictNLS by itself is 87% correct with 26% coverage on the same data.) |
Go back to the NucPred Home Page.